Display:
Pills blamed for Gulf War syndrome - Health News, Health & Wellbeing - The Independent

A landmark investigation into the causes of Gulf War syndrome has concluded that the illness was caused by troops being given nerve gas pills and exposed to pesticides.

The study in the United States, mandated by Congress and described as one of the most wide-ranging undertaken on the subject, found that the most likely cause of the illness was pyridostigmine bromide (PB) in protection pills given to American and British troops to counter the Soman nerve gas Saddam Hussein could have used in the 1991 Gulf War. US soldiers were also affected by neurotoxins in pesticides extensively used in preparation for operations.

The findings led to immediate calls for official action on both sides of the Atlantic. In the UK, troops' welfare groups said the British Government must do more to help those affected and carry out its own comprehensive research. The British Government has insisted there is not enough scientific evidence so far to prove the existence of Gulf War syndrome. But it has agreed to offer war pensions to members of the forces who became ill after serving in the first Gulf war. About 6,000 British service personnel, out of 55,000 mobilised for the conflict, are reported to be suffering from the symptoms of Gulf War syndrome. Many were medically discharged from the forces and have had to give up subsequent civilian jobs due to ill health. The Royal British Legion demanded that a payment of £10,000 be made to each veteran suffering from the ailment in compensation for a failure of duty of care.

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 04:11:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
very bad science

the most likely cause of the illness was pyridostigmine bromide (PB) in protection pills given to American and British troops to counter the Soman nerve gas Saddam Hussein could have used in the 1991 Gulf War.

Were US or UK troops actually exposed to Saddam's bio-weapons in 1991? We'd have to read the study itself to attribute pill failure to gas exposure vs pill success vs gas exposure to pill placebo vs gas placebo --without knowing pill dosage(s) in any case-- in order to begin to hypothesize adverse reactions (primary or secondary systemic failure or "syndrome" diagnoses ) to pill or pesticide prescriptions.

I'm kinda sick of this risk-free pharma testing.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 05:00:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm not aweare that any chemical weapons were used in GW1.

the US admitted responsibility for Gulf War Syndrome many years ago, having done a lot of tests and recognised that certain combinations of preventative agents became neurotoxic.

The MoD have always had a much more cavalier attitude to safety and health. So have refused to do anything other than the most superficial tests and investigations intended to avoid blame and defer compensation. It is no surprise that the British still haven't got comprehensive testing done cos I imagine the govt have done anything and everything to interfere.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Nov 19th, 2008 at 06:11:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No gas was used nor was it ever likely to be used.  The troops were used as medical guinea pigs, which is not uncommon in the US military.
by paving on Wed Nov 19th, 2008 at 03:13:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, that is a difficult, huge and hairy pill to swallow in the laboratory of public policy.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Wed Dec 3rd, 2008 at 11:30:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series