Display:
Hence the caveat:
An increase in the number of union members can  make disregarding the interests of labor more difficult for Democrats in general.  But for this to be true Democratic elected officials and union leaders will need to learn better ways of communicating with union members and of addressing their concerns  so the Republicans cannot siphon them off on bogus "social wedge issues."


As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 01:36:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Unionisation always seems to suffer from the problem of recreating capitalist social stratification in miniature. This can be a good thing when there's a positive vision for improved mobility, but a bad one when the focus moves away from overall worker solidarity towards a very partial solidarity which is limited to very specific sub-groups.

Unionisation worked well when relationships between workers and owners were very concentrated. Now that they're not - at least not in most Western economies - something more diffuse and inclusive could be more effective.

As long as worker pressure is split along occupational lines, it's far too easy to play divide and conquer.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 07:49:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series