Display:
Of course there is a lot of social mobility - largely because of old Labour post war education reforms - but also, more recently, with the mechanisation of manual labour, and the decline of industry, many previous "manual" workers now by force of circumstance have to re-train and many will end up in service industries and in non-manual occupations.

So yes, not only does social mobility occur - some research indicates that, contrary to popular belief, social mobility is actually more prevalent in Europe than in the USA - and also the whole basis of "class society" is changing, with manual occupations increasingly marginalised, and other indicators - education level, income range, life chances at birth etc. - being used as proxies to assign class affiliation.

Central to any class analysis, however constructed, is the notion that whatever the political aspirations to equal citizenship may be, there is great real inequality within Capitalist society, and that the interests of the owners of capital (however philanthropic) and the interests of those whose primary source of income is their labour, are not the same, and sometimes, indeed, those interests can be diametrically opposed.

notes from no w here

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 08:32:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The old blue collar working class has become almost invisible politically and much less visible socially. People still do appallingly crappy jobs, but after deindustrialisation in the UK they usually do them as temps. The localised and organised blue collar working class, who would live,  work and organise in the same neighbourhoods has been replaced by a white collar working class who do crappy menial office jobs - working in call centres, accounts, basic IT maintenance, salesandmarketing, training.

These are physically less demanding, but far more stressful intellectually and ethically, because many workplaces are set up to encourage competitive backstabbing, performance goals are carefully monitored and all-but impossible to achieve, and management has little interest in practical results and more interest in maintaining hierarchies and - in extreme cases - authoritarian bullying and abuse.

There's also a swarm of so-called freelancers and consultants who are upmarket temps employed on limited-term commissions and projects. This can be lucrative, but it's almost entirely dependent on outside factors.

It's much harder to organise in these fluid environments, so there's very little prospect of effective unionisation.

It's nice that people today have inside toilets and central heating, which they mostly didn't before WWII. But work environments have moved from one kind of abusive harshness to a different one, and I don't think anyone who works below the level of middle management is going to pretend that they're in a happy workers' paradise.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Nov 18th, 2008 at 08:50:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't think anyone who works below the level of middle management is going to pretend that they're in a happy workers' paradise.

Not true.  I'm below middle management, and I get to pick my own boss.  And when he makes me angry, I can go stand in front of his house and shout obscenities without getting fired.

Beat that.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin

by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Wed Nov 19th, 2008 at 08:22:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series