Display:
With GM/Ford do far behind Euroasian carmakers in terms of quality/fuel efficiency, diesel, hybrid, fuel cell and electric drive trains etc. one has to wonder whether the best strategic move - at huge short term cost - would not be to let GM/Ford go bust and let Eurasian and start-ups with alternative technologies take over - provided they build more US production plants.  The British Govt. but huge amounts into Brtish Leyland, it continued to produce crap and died anyway.

notes from no w here
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Wed Nov 19th, 2008 at 05:39:50 PM EST
GM-USA is mostly a truck maker ... GM-Europe is mostly responsible for sedans, GM-Asia for compacts.

One approach, of course, is a tariff with a compensating credit ... if a country imports $50 in cars and components for each $100 they import, they get a 50% credit on tariffs. Phase that in, and give the US carmakers a 5 year deadline ... become viable or die. Within 5 years, European and Asian carmakers will have sorted out which components are the best to source from the US, and the dependency of the US auto industry on the US carmakers would be reduced substantially.

Of course, this is the week in the year when a Buckeye would describe a plan for big chunks of the Ohio car industry to survive while "Detroit" shuts down. Singing, I don't give a damn for the Whole State of Michigan, I'm from Ohio


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Wed Nov 19th, 2008 at 07:20:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series