Display:
I'd be surprised if it does because 'economic apartheid' doesn't really exist as a socially acknowledged form of inequality in the same way that gender and race do.

It's not that no one is aware of it - especially in the UK and US, where everyone knows exactly what class they are, and who's above and below them.

But practical economic apartheid simply isn't considered a form of discrimination.

In fact the whole point of the anglo economies is the promotion of earning differentials and economic discrimination.

That's always been the main aim of neo-liberal economic rhetoric - it's not about sharing, innovation or mutual support, it's about imagined personal sovereignty gauged entirely by how much cash you have, and how wastefully you can throw it around.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 at 05:10:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"neo liberalism" should be more precisely called "economic libertarianism", in the now famous tradition of Ayn Rand & Co (like, Alan Greenspan).

This is quite a telling proof to the fact that there is no such thing as "unlimited" freedom (or even tending there). And I say this from a more philosophical viewpoint, rather than the politically "progressive" sharing (in France, social "solidarity").

Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last! (Martin Luther King)

by ValentinD (walentijn arobase free spot frança) on Sun Nov 2nd, 2008 at 06:53:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series