Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:
I like this Chinese proverb a lot, too. ;)

i said it wasn't chinese! afaik, anyway, but i guess it may as well be...

I'd be very reluctant to want to see her judged. When something feels spiritually wrong - it is wrong, and not just by our "moral lights".

yes well, there you have it in a nutshell.

first of all, it's her body, not anyone else's. this point cannot be emphasized too much.

and secondly 'our moral lights' are only universal if we declaim them to be, and since we are fallible, (last time i checked!), how can we ever be sure that our morals are good for everyone else?

that way lies madness...

of course the mothers need help, if they had that they probably wouldn't want to abort, in most cases.

but all this will come out if you do that diary on abortion you said you might.

It would be interesting to know why your father harboured such bitter feelings; the reason was in him - not in you. I hope that you can find peace. He is no longer there, and - maybe - they'll both still have their chance to find God.

yes it would be interesting, that has been the most time-consuming mental activity life has thrown my way. the side effect of studying it has given me a clue or two about 'anglo disease', so there's a silver lining. he was so totally unwilling to 'know himself' on any other level that material...

i have found a rough peace, but it is patched and tattered. he is very much still here, though his body ain't.

god is found when we surrender our pride, for some that's an option they do not entertain, for some reason unknown to my dim self.

how to welcome others into faith when they would rather live without it?

we can't control, but we can exemplify. i am quite willing to entertain the idea that my knowledge of god is simply singularities occurring in my neurochemistry, then things take a distinct turn towards more interesting, contemplating that fact.

step by step, science and spirituality are converging. i see absolutely no mutual threat to either.

much so-called religion, on the other hand, has a lot to lose...

The power of knowledge is in mortal combat with the knowledge of power. It really is that simple... That's the Edenic apple we are all munching on.

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Tue Nov 25th, 2008 at 07:52:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
i said it wasn't chinese!

:o - well, yes, it probably sounded so Chinese that I decided to ignore the not and took it for that. ;)

first of all, it's her body, not anyone else's. this point cannot be emphasized too much.

This is not a debate of one life against the other. The baby would never want to see his/her mother dead. 'Her body' holds life's largest miracle.

The topic has been so much over-argued that I wouldn't want to roll it all out again. There will always be opinion against opinion.
There is little room for discourse or compromise. One either wants to protect the life of the unborn child, or what will be considered the best (better) interest of the woman.

 

by Lily (put - lilyalmond - here <a> yahaah.france) on Tue Nov 25th, 2008 at 08:12:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
you certainly don't have to convince me that a world without abortion is the ultimate goal for all respecters of the Great Miracle that is the creation of a human being.

it's just that life ain't linear, and to enforce this belief on others, no matter how convinced one is about the justness of the act, is to pretend the woman is not the decider of her future responsibility.

women have it hard enough already, some get pregnant because they're basically too nice to say no, and the men don't have anything like the same set of consequences to face, so should definitely not be the arbiters.

subscribing to this belief is great, and acts as an affirmation that we will work this out eventually to the satisfaction of all, but using legislation to regulate morality can be taken far too far, far too soon.

it's the loons this attitude aligns one with is a pretty big clue... no offence...

it comes back to the nigh-insurmountable challenge of guaranteeing that child a future good enough that the mother would willingly make that choice, over her own maternal instincts to keep the child, or abort it to save it from a horrible life. at which point such legislation wouldn't be necessary...

i really see a fork in the road between humility and arrogance here, and i've puzzled long and hard about it, because if one could square that political circle, one could create a huge, good-hearted voting block, that is presently blindly clinging to the right, and would probably, without that fly in the jam, swell the ranks of the left considerably, thereby upping the chances of creating the very type of society that might, one day, see fit to accord the Great Miracle more respect, by not men legislating putting women in such a 'sophie's choice', especially when most of said men subscribe to wars at whim, and show no sign at all of legislating much to protect the rights of children already born.

that's the soulsucking cognitive dissonance at the kernel of this argument, imo.

if one is so moved by the rights of a foetus, let one go take care of all the hungry, roofless, abused children already members of the born, and by the time we sort that out, the new Golden Age will have snuck right up on us!

it sucks, i know... it's one of those 'lesser evil' deals, methinks...

all this worrying about CAPITAL, when the real waste is in every undernourished child, and each clueless, undereducated pregnant mother-to-be cramming junk food and alcohol into her benighted bloodstream needs a bailout... imagine what it would do for the future generations if those fabled billions used to flush the toxic debt down the crapper were invested in prenatal education and care, it'd the no-brainer BEST investment we could ever make in the future happiness of mankind.

sometimes it seems anti-abortion activists miss the forest for the trees, and even remind me of those hindus who walk slowly with a soft broom, sweeping the dust in front of them in case they step on some innocent life form...

noble, but disproportionate.

abortion is a terrible thing and should be limited to an absolute minimum, and especially kept away from the coathanger, back alley brigade, whose black market always immediately fills the vacuum created by such short-sighted legislation.

christ, people are people, and they have so much to learn, making legal criminals moralistically just rubs salt into an already painful wound.

believing in reincarnation helps me here, every child of god will have as many chances as it needs to come learn the lessons of living here, in the fullness of time... that's what eternity means, i submit...

thanks for an interesting discussion, lily. this is a very important issue, how to reconcile spiritual conscience with political consciousness, in fact i don't think it gets any more important...

plus anything that gets colman to gift us with one of those witty one-liners this kind of diary tends to evince from him, well they're priceless, the one in this thread about being afflicted with faith...LOL

there truly is something divine about this type of humour, i sometimes think it must be god's favourite, since i think (s)he likes a good laugh at hir own expense, that's one bank that'll never fail!

you go colman! you might be even funnier than even you think!

:)

The power of knowledge is in mortal combat with the knowledge of power. It really is that simple... That's the Edenic apple we are all munching on.

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Fri Nov 28th, 2008 at 03:18:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series