Display:
Bloomberg had this, yesterday:


Citigroup May End Up With U.S. Government Rescue

Nov. 22 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. government may step in to rescue Citigroup Inc. after a crisis in confidence erased half the bank's stock-market value in three days, according to investors and analysts.

Citigroup's $2 trillion of assets dwarfs companies such as American International Group Inc. that got support from the U.S. government this year. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke may favor a rescue to avoid the chaotic aftermath of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.'s bankruptcy in September.

"Citi is in the category of `too big to fail,'" said Michael Holland, chairman and founder of Holland & Co. in New York, which oversees $4 billion. "There is a commitment from this administration and the next to do what it takes to save Citi."

But no details yet.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sun Nov 23rd, 2008 at 12:19:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Isn't amazing how we live in an era in which "too big to fail" means it probably will?

George Orwell eat your heart out.

The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman

by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Sun Nov 23rd, 2008 at 12:37:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
What's worrying is that a lot of banks seem to be working hard to get mergers going, making even more of the industry "too big to fail".

I suppose it actually makes sense, if being too big means the govt will bail you out, then it's worth the hassle of merging to ensure a safety net.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Nov 23rd, 2008 at 01:12:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I posted that one last night in the Salon. There was nothing else worth picking up on Citi at the time.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Nov 23rd, 2008 at 01:13:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
itigroup, U.S. in Talks to Create 'Bad Bank'

Citigroup Inc. is nearing agreement with U.S. government officials to create a structure that would house some of the financial giant's risky assets, according to people familiar with the situation.

While the discussions remain fluid and might not result in an agreement, talks were progressing Sunday toward creation of what would essentially be a "bad bank." That structure would help Citigroup cleanse its balance sheet of billions of dollars in potentially toxic assets, these people said.

The bad bank also might absorb assets from Citigroup's off-balance-sheet entities, which hold $1.23 trillion. Some of those assets are tied to mortgages, and investors have worried such assets could cause heavy losses if they land on the company's balance sheet. Citigroup also has about $2 trillion in loans, securities and other assets on its balance sheet as of Sept. 30.

Behind the push is a broad effort to shore up faith in the New York company, which saw its stock price tumble by 60% last week to a 16-year low.

Under the terms being discussed, Citigroup would agree to absorb losses on assets covered by the agreement up to a certain threshold. The federal government would cover losses beyond that level, people familiar with the matter said. One person said the new entity is expected to hold about $50 billion of assets.

Hey, it's only 3 times the Crédit Lyonnais... and it's not government-owned.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sun Nov 23rd, 2008 at 06:00:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series