European Tribune

Display:
Obama's small donor base image is a myth, new study reveals | Top of the Ticket | Los Angeles Times

Everybody knows how President-elect Barack Obama's amazing campaign money machine was dominated by several million regular folks sending in hard-earned amounts under $200, a real sign of his broadbased grassroots support.

Except, it turns out, that's not really true.

In fact, Obama's base of small donors was almost exactly the same percent as George W. Bush's in 2004 -- Obama had 26% and the great Republican satan 25%. Obviously, this is unacceptable to current popular thinking.

But the nonpartisan Campaign Finance Institute just issued a detailed study of Obama's donor base and its giving. And that's what the Institute found, to its own surprise.

"The myth is that money from small donors dominated Barack Obama's finances," said CFI's executive director Michael Malbin, admitting that his organization also was fooled. "The reality of Obama's fundraising was impressive, but the reality does not match the myth."

by Fran (fran at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Nov 30th, 2008 at 01:47:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This is deliberately misleading - it's using a technical definition of small (<$200) donors to suggest that Obama got the rest of his money from corporates and traditional big-ticket donors.

In fact what happened is that many 'small' donors gave a lot more than $200, taking them out of the official small bracket. But they were still individual donations, and not part of the usual corporate cash milking round.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sun Nov 30th, 2008 at 05:42:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series