they're materialists and support Darwin, but refuse biological determination
Which is different from Darwin's position in what way?
they support human rights in all cases - except those when those are promoted by Rightwing/capitalist governments or groups (human rights come behind class warfare)
You'll need to give examples here, because I don't know any case where the left has opposed human rights on grounds that class warfare was more important.
they are ready to destroy anyone even nuancing anti-racist policies,
Can you cite even a single example of such right-wing "nuancing" resulting in an expansion of anti-racist protections? If you can't, I'd call that pure newspeak. If you think anti-racist protections are too widespread and need to be rolled back, come right out and say so and be prepared to defend your case - don't hide behind weasel words like "nuancing."
but they support multiculturalism
Oh, R'lyeh?
You really should go back in the archives and read some of the flame wars from around the time of the Cartoon Jihad...
"They support multiculturalism..." I laugh so I don't cry.
they are ready to terminate anyone even implying a doubt about far-right policies, but they understand far-left philosophy; crucify nazism and justify communism
Dude, now you're conflating different variants of communism again. Nobody here makes apologetics for Stalin and his merry band of butchers - and if somebody does, he gets crucified, as you so aptly put it.
But in tarring all of communism with Stalin et al, you're attempting to relegate half of the mainstream European left for most of the 20th century to an extremist fringe. That's simply not honest brokerage in the debate. We're talking here about people who were opposed to the Soviet Union, who were opposed to violent repression (who were, in many countries actually the targets of violent repression), who were opposed to toppling democratically elected governments and imposing dictatorial regimes. How the fuck is any of this "far-left" or remotely comparable to nazism?
OK, the term "communist" carries negative connotations for you, because you were oppressed by a communist regime. That's OK, I get that. But it doesn't make all communists evil or comparable to nazis. Just like the fact that some people get bad vibes from the term "catholic" because they were raped as kids by a Catholic priest doesn't make all catholics child-raping perverts. And just as the fact that "capitalism" carries unfortunate connotations for many Chileans doesn't make all advocates of capitalism the equivalent of Milton Friedman and Augusto Pinochet.
- Jake If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.
I was more speaking about how left comes off by and large, impressions and tendencies, when we look from above.
Me, personally, hathes no issue with the left the moment private property and enterprise stops being evil. On the other hand, "my hero" :) Nicolas Sarkozy, said a very important thing once: the Left should not be allowed as the only defence of the poor, the vulnerable, the different. Granted, this is because in France things are much more polarised and the left much more to the left than elsewhere, and it had become impossible to allow the left occupy the place of the angel waging war on the vicious capitalists. But it's a sign of entering traditional left domain, just like your dear Bliar entered left one, and with as much success. That's the way that leads to pragmatism. Is that going to lead to an unideological democracy? Are lack of ideology and pragmatism a sign of a-politicalness? Does this mean democracy is in danger? Those are the questions, rather than about more or less humane variants of communism. Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last! (Martin Luther King)
But you don't look from above. You look through the lens of the media you consume, and the principles and opinions that you already hold. That's an important point that you keep refusing to acknowledge.
