The typical response of the ideologist - ignore the evidence, ignore the arguments - a dictatorship is not a version of communism - and pretend that "practice" is your opinion about what happened. Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.
No, of course you don't have to cite anything - you just think to know and we are supposed to accept your opinion which is, like the truly ideological, impervious to the evidence and doesn't bother to offer any. Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.
You want me to prove that dialectical materialism, or historical materialism was materialist and, well, dialectical ? :) Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last! (Martin Luther King)
Only at the end of it all, after the Armaghedon, came the selfless sharing community.
I provided evidence showing this was not true, Marx allowed for the possibility of peaceful change. You don't dispute the evidence - you simply decide to ignore it and just proceed with the usual ideological nonsense. It's about time you tried to deal with arguments in a serious way. Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.
You know, you've almost earned all of these in a single thread... Those aren't precisely merit badges, ya'know. No need to pursue them so relentlessly.
- Jake If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.
