European Tribune

Display:
What about this "narrative": The Anglo right (and many on the right) are concerned with wealth and power accumulation of their constituency (the have-mores). If that is achievable through deregulation, fine. If it is achievable through state bailouts, fine also.

The minor ideological issues of more or less state are left for the chattering classes to discuss. What really matters is the continuous wealth transfer process, irrespective of means.

A different approach...

Of all forms of caution, caution in love is perhaps the most fatal to true happiness - Bertrand Russell

by tiagoantao (put_my_login_here <> gmail com) on Thu Nov 27th, 2008 at 01:36:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And don't forget the current justification - which is that this is 'pragmatic', while criticisms of it are 'ideological.'
by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Nov 27th, 2008 at 07:08:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It may give them too much credit, but they seem to be whip-sawing us in just that way. You left out fuel-based inflation and speculative bubbles in general, but I'm sure that you were just using the two examples above to illustrate your point.

paul spencer
by paul spencer (spencerinthegorge AT yahoo DOT com) on Fri Nov 28th, 2008 at 01:03:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You don't need to give them "too much credit" in order for this to happen. I sincerely do not see the have-mores as being more or less clever than most of the general populace.

You just need to have a view of the human race where people are very good at looking at their belly, but very bad at seeing the general picture (unless they do an effort, in fact even if they do an effort they might fail).

I imagine the following scenario: Fat cat is sitting on his office, all goes well. Profits start plunging, fat cat starts to worry. Fat cat phones friend and former colleague Paulson asking for help. People at Treasury, having been in the same position as the fat cat can relate to his problem and think it is a really fundamental problem that needs to be addressed or society is Doomed(TM). They've been there, they can relate. If they've had another life experience (say, having trouble finding a job and feeding their kids) they might consider other types of problems important.

Even if they cared for the welfare of all, their view on how to tackle the problem would be severely constrained by their life experiences.

As the sh.t hits the fan, they just want to sort out things in order to get back to their normal lifes. If that means big state intervention, that is of a minor consideration now.

Of all forms of caution, caution in love is perhaps the most fatal to true happiness - Bertrand Russell

by tiagoantao (put_my_login_here <> gmail com) on Fri Nov 28th, 2008 at 07:34:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series