Display:
In a taz interview with Priska Hinz (Greens), who would have became culture minister under Ypsilanti, she notes that the conscience-plagued had no trouble voting down CDU plans with the Left Party in the past 10 months (the left-of-centre majority fulfilled an election promise by kicking tuition fees). Also, she doesn't want to exclude any constellation for after new elections (naming Ypsilanti's pre-elections rejection of the Left Party as the bad example).

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Nov 3rd, 2008 at 06:27:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The heaviest criticism for Ypsilanti (apart from the usual suspects in the punditry) come from the Greens (alos in the above interview), for a failure to keep his own in line. But I can only partly agree.

You can't say there was no sustained attempt to keep the dissenters on board. All four rebels noted that they have been "under extreme pressure". Then again, that may mean that Ypsilanti and her supporters relied solely Schröder's and Müntefering's recipe for disacipline from the olden' days, mobbing. And yet again, I don't see a lot of other choices.

For example, I don't understand how anyone could have thought that giving Walter the economic ministry to keep him from rebelling was in the realm of the possible. This is the key post for one of Ypsilanti's key election themes, a potential saboteur there would just have killed her ambitious renewables program -- and especially Greens should see that.

Still, maybe more would have been possible. I have this crazy idea that maybe the big anti-communists could have been moved if Ypsilanti had them sit down for a long chat in small circle with van Ooyen & co.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Tue Nov 4th, 2008 at 12:53:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
As I see it is fair criticism towards the Soc dems as an organisation.

Parties remain competitors even if they cooperate. When party A makes a deal they need to know that party B will uphold their part. If the deal falls through party A needs to establish that it was party B's fault, so as not to be blamed by the voters.

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!

by A swedish kind of death on Tue Nov 4th, 2008 at 01:58:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series