Display:
It's not quite a fiasco, in that no trains have been advertised, so how people can be stranded is difficult to work out.

Of course, the question as to why there are no trains over this period is a differnet thing entirely. The fact is that trains are not regarded as infrastructure, not regarded as an essential service. Government here is in the business of abdication of responsibility, so trains are run for profit and they don't run when profit is hard to realise.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Dec 24th, 2008 at 06:01:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
as I found out last Saturday. its impossible to get into london and get back after nine on a saturday night.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Wed Dec 24th, 2008 at 06:16:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
To be fair engineering upgrades and renewals are essential, and they have to be done some time. It's often not physically possible to do them without closing the tracks for an extended period.

What's farcical here is the lack of responsibility for this. In the wonderful free market privatised railway no one is responsible for anything, least of all a NuLab government which promised renationalisation, or a civil service which doesn't like trains much.

Bad PR for rail is good news for Whitehall, if only because of default passive aggression.

Travellers barely count in this soap opera.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Dec 24th, 2008 at 08:39:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series