Emil has posted an interesting diary, whether you disagree with its proposition or not
this is endeavoured by addressing the blind spot: who are we, what is our work
for the intellectually inclined, Integral Theory makes it insightful that there are blind spots and how they can be addressed. Previous postings also have this intention.
posting more elaborately seems redundant, since all the information is available for all to see. See also reply to Colman below
Actually, those pictures appear to contain about a 1000 words, few of which are found in that order in normal english. Any chance of an explanation that isn't obfuscated by the jargon?
posting pictures is intended to evoke curiosity and consequent greater knowledge regarding the subject matter. Pictures aren't always sufficiently sharp in order to read the fine print. I hope this does not hinder curiousity.
Integral Theory addresses spirituality, as it addresses any perspective. Leading to the adagium 'all perspectives are true, but partial'
'spirituality' (that is the non dual pointer versions) transcends and includes all perspectives. It can only be explored by using the proper techniques and tools. Given the uniqueness of the findings (as in any specialized field), only an audience of the adequate (who have gone before using the techniques and tools) can deliver relevant feedback regarding what one's explorations have come up with. Just the scientific method applied to a forgotten/disowned/unfamiliar domain.