The willingness of the ECB to "bail out" a country that is not yet a member of the Euro zone is significant, and points to the concerns European Monetary Union members now have about the disruptive effects of a crisis in Hungary.
He sees it as a defensive move to protect the eurozone (ie a self-interested decision) rather a move to actually help Hungary. That's what I mean by seeing it through a purely economic lense. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
More to the point, what do you think of his claim that the risk of a domino effect across the new EU members could overwhelm the ECB's resources? (I think he is mistaken about the size of the default risk, but wqonder what's your take.) *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
(My take is that even Hungary is/was not in danger of exhausting this cushion, much less the rest of the new members, but that may not be your take or from where you approach this question.) *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.