Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:
Happy? No. But not outraged either.

As I see it you presented a case as to why I and others should be outraged. I can't really be outraged that groups I dislike use the sordid process to their advantage. It would be like being outraged that fundamentalist forces in the arab world are using the american crusades to their advantage.

By choosing the path of bypassing referenda in all countries were it was possible our political elites - working as a group - handed this argument on a silver platter to anyone opposing the treaty in the only member country where a referendum is mandatory. And it was completedly predictable. If you knew - and I guess that was predictable too - that it would be "neo-fascist, neo-conservative, religious fundamentalist, and anti-EU nationalist groups" that opposed the treaty then you knew who you were handing the argument too. Which leaves as conclusion that our political elites are either too institutionally stupid to realise this or do not care about it.

Personally I have not formed an opinion on the Constitution or its heir. I do however have opinions on the process. So I doubt that they are blocking the treaty on my behalf - indeed I don't see any signs that a no in Ireland blocks the treaty. The rules of the process looks highly mutable to me.

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!

by A swedish kind of death on Mon Dec 29th, 2008 at 05:11:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
A swedish kind of death:
It would be like being outraged that fundamentalist forces in the arab world are using the american crusades to their advantage.

However if I am one of the Arabs whose society is threatened by the fundamentalists trying to take it over, should I not care?  Would you not care if you were an citizen living in a society threatened by fundamentalist takeover - e.g. Pakistan?  Blaming it on the Americans isn't going to help your child if he/she is forced into a Madrassa and if you stood by and let that takeover happen.

It's always easier to blame somebody else - especially if they can be referred to as some elite or foreign influence.

I think this Diary and discussion thread has died - if it ever really got off the ground.  I will try and summaries my argument in a new Diary and perhaps we can continue this discussion there.

notes from no w here

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Mon Dec 29th, 2008 at 05:46:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Frank Schnittger:
However if I am one of the Arabs whose society is threatened by the fundamentalists trying to take it over, should I not care?  Would you not care if you were an citizen living in a society threatened by fundamentalist takeover - e.g. Pakistan?  Blaming it on the Americans isn't going to help your child if he/she is forced into a Madrassa and if you stood by and let that takeover happen.

Points that are all valid in motivating outrage if you are living in Ireland. I understand your outrage, but you are not likely to get outrage at your local groups from people abroad. Or so I reccon. As presumably white skinned, do you feel outraged that racists twits in Sweden and elsewhere outside Ireland base their arguments on the good of the so called white race? Not outrage at them for being racist, but outrage at them for including you in their group who they claim to defend?

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!

by A swedish kind of death on Mon Dec 29th, 2008 at 06:47:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
A swedish kind of death:
As presumably white skinned, do you feel outraged that racists twits in Sweden and elsewhere outside Ireland base their arguments on the good of the so called white race? Not outrage at them for being racist, but outrage at them for including you in their group who they claim to defend?

Absolutely, I am outraged and diminished by such actions.  My whole Masters thesis in Peace Studies in 1989 was based, inter alia, on the fact that Apartheid in South Africa elicited much greater outrage within Europe in Particular (than say Idi Amin's much greater death toll) because its apologists claimed to be white, western, European and Christian and thus claimed to Justify Apartheid by reference to our values.  For us to accede to that claim would be to accept racism within our societies as well, and thus that claim had to be resisted ferociously by anyone concerned with civil liberties here.

A similar argument can be made about Israel today.  Objectively Israel's depredations in Palestine might be considered to be much lesser than say Pol Pot, Rwanda, or perhaps even Zimbabwe today.  However Israel claims to share our western democratic values, beliefs and structures - claims in effect to be one of us fighting a common cause against Islamic terrorism.  For us to accept that claim would be to accept that bombing of civilian targets and ethnically cleansing those of a different ethnicity/religion from their own lands is ok by us.

I can't believe you wouldn't be outraged by that either even though it doesn't effect you directly.

PS - I have now published my new diary, so perhaps we could continue this discussion there.

notes from no w here

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Mon Dec 29th, 2008 at 07:20:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series