Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:

Next June all EU member states go to the polls to elect a new European Parliament.  Let us see how many anti-Lisbon members are elected then.  Should the vast majority of European Parliament members elected then continue to support Lisbon will we then finally hear an end to the cant that Ireland is somehow more democratic that all other EU member states? I won't be holding my breath.  

It is a implied falacy (there might be a better word, but it would not sound less strong) that voting for a pro-Lisbon party is the same as supporting the Lisbon treaty. Don't take my vote for the Labour Party as a support for Lisbon (which is what you are implicitly doing). The 70% or so people that vote for parties that are pro-Lisbon might (or might not be) pro-Lisbon themselves. In countries like .NL people voted on pro-Lisbon on local parliament and most probably will vote the same on the EP and AT THE SAME TIME voted no on Nice (and were not give the opportunity on Lisbon). What do you honestly think is the main sentiment in the UK about Lisbon?

You, on the other hand suggested that I belong to the same bunch as Libertas. I take that as offensive. While I might agree with their empty rethoric (surely not with their agenda) in some issues I have nothing to do with them. Or should I call you Frank Blair Brown Sarkozy Schnittger just because you agree with those characters on this issue?

by t-------------- on Tue Dec 23rd, 2008 at 01:24:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
tiagoantao:
It is a implied falacy (there might be a better word, but it would not sound less strong) that voting for a pro-Lisbon party is the same as supporting the Lisbon treaty. Don't take my vote for the Labour Party as a support for Lisbon (which is what you are implicitly doing).

It is equally possible that people voting for an anti-Lisbon party like the Tories don't have a particular problem with Lisbon insofar as they know or care one way or another.  Bottom line - you appear to be denying the democratic legitimacy of the European Parliament to speak for Europe on this issue.  

But much worse - from my point of view - you seem to be happy to allow a motley collection of bigots, fascists and neo-cons in Ireland - with 1% of EU population - to block a proposal you don't like even though it has been approved by Governments mandated to speak for their countries representing c. 95% of the population.  That doesn't sound like democracy as I know it, even if the true figure for people specifically supporting Lisbon or knowing enough about it to care is much closer to 50%.

notes from no w here

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Tue Dec 23rd, 2008 at 01:44:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There is a missive falacy going on here (which Jerome also seems to endorse).

There is no European nation, nor European democracy. The EU is a sum of countries bound by a series of treaties. The Irish (or any country) have the right to say stop according to the rules accepted by all. There is no majority rule agreed. We never agreed to that to begin with.

The agreement in place is consensus based. Saying that we are an European democracy is false. The Irish (or the people of Cyprus, for that matter) have legitimacy to stop going foward because the accepted rules of the game are consensus based.

I am not saying it is good or bad. I am just saying that you are tweaking the existing rules and existing agreements to serve your point of view.

The current EU is not a majority based system, don't suggest that those are the rules of the game, they are not. Lisbon would not make it so by the way (there are a few needed minimums to makes things go forward).

by t-------------- on Sun Dec 28th, 2008 at 12:28:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Frank Schnittger:
I don't think I am trying to make any of the arguments you suppose:

  1. The EU of Nice or Lisbon is neither one political entity nor akin to the USA.  It is still a Union of sovereign states who have pooled some sovereignty and are only beginning to develop the concept of European citizen ship rights as distinct from the rights from member state constitutions.


notes from no w here
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Sun Dec 28th, 2008 at 01:49:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I have to insist on 1 point to make it clear.

Citing you:


But much worse - from my point of view - you seem to be happy to allow a motley collection of bigots, fascists and neo-cons in Ireland - with 1% of EU population - to block a proposal you don't like even though it has been approved by Governments mandated to speak for their countries representing c. 95% of the population.

Yes, I am "happy" with it. The current rules of the game say that to change the rules of the games all countries (irrespective of size) have to agree. If one tiny country blocks it, then, tough luck. That is it.

You see, I strongly believe that the only civilized way for nations (and big groups of people in general) to relate among themselves is through respect of the law and existing agreements. I am, in principle, against tweaking the rules for my convinience. If, say, the parliament of Luxemburg would have voted 51/49 against it, again, though luck.

Of course, exceptions might be opened in extreme cases (say a military coup in one of the EU countries). And while the result of direct democracy in Ireland might have been influenced by people we find despicable, the process in Ireland is still a form of democracy.

While I respect representative democracy (and believe it is an acceptable way to ratify the treaty), the processes in countries which either had referenda for Nice and then no referenda for Lisbon (Spain, France, The Netherlands) or promised a referendum during representative elections and then failed to deliver it (at least Portugal) puts the situation on those countries on a very shaky grounds in terms of respect for democracy (irrespective of is is either representative or  direct. The point here is that governments seem to be trying to avoid people to deliberate about that issue).

I don't see how one can say the process in Ireland was worse than in .ES/FR/NL/PT.

This has nothing to do with my opinion on the treaty (I am moderately against it. In fact I think I am most against it because of the contempt for "the people" that, in my personal opinion, was shown on the whole process).

PS - As a side, I think most people here see the european comission as a group of people which represent european social values. I think most are deluded. But that is another topic.

by t-------------- on Sun Dec 28th, 2008 at 07:41:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
tiagoantao:
I don't see how one can say the process in Ireland was worse than in .ES/FR/NL/PT.

I am quite happy with the constitutional position in Ireland where changes in the Constitution require a referendum.  I thought the YES side fought a lousy campaign last time around, but that is neither here nor there.  The NO side ran an extremely effective scaremongering campaign such that many NO voters genuinely believed that Lisbon would usher in an era of abortion on demand, enforced secularisation, conscription into a European army etc.  But that's Irish politics and it is OUR problem to resolve.

The major argument from the NO side which I object to (and which I thought relevant to raise with a European audience here) is that the NO campaigners claim to represent and speak on behalf of millions of anti-Lisbon people in other European countries.  I object to this because:

  1. Sinn Fein et al have no mandate to speak for any electorate outside the island of Ireland

  2. people in other countries have elected their own Government and opposition parties to represent them in the European and National parliaments throughout Europe

  3. In my view the EU has made a significant historic contribution to democracy, peace and prosperity between protagonists in two world wars, and more recently within formerly fascist and communist states.  I can see no comparable contribution to democracy by Sinn Fein who have only recently stopped killing Irish people - including Irish parliamentarians, police and soldiers.

  4. If you want Sinn Fein to be able to claim unchallenged that they represent you as far as Lisbon is concerned, there is nothing I can do to prevent that.  However I thought that many people in Europe, even those angry with how their Governments ratified Lisbon, would still not wish to be represented by the likes of Sinn Fein/Libertas/Coir because they do not support neo-fascist, neo conservative or religious fundamentalist parties in their own countries, and would therefor be principled enough not to do so in Ireland either.  Perhaps I was wrong about this.

  5. I believe that if Sinn Fein/Libertas/Coir succeed in their objective of killing Lisbon, the result will be that Ireland will be marginalised and isolated in Europe and that a twin speed Europe will probably result. Thus Ireland will be marginalised within Europe just as potential anti-Lisbon voters were marginalised in other European countries.  I don't expect that European anti-Lisbon sympathisers will be effective in preventing that happening.  I don't want Ireland to become the sacrificial lamb just so that anti-Lisbon Europeans can cock a snook at their own Governments.  It is not anti-Lisbon Europeans in other European countries who will suffer if Ireland IS marginalised - but Irish people themselves.  

  6. Even if Ireland is not marginalised, I believe tie EU will be fundamentally weakened and less able to function effectively in a rapidly globalising and destabilising world.  As a small country, Ireland needs the EU a lot more than the EU needs Ireland. Clearly the primary responsibility for preventing this happening rests with Irish people themselves.  However it would have been nice if we didn't have to fight just domestic nationalists and neo-fascists, but also Tory Eurosceptics, US funded Neo-cons, Le Pen, Vaclav Klaus, and sundry European nationalists and neo-fascists as well.

I had hoped to get some support for this larger battle on ET.  As usual, I have been disappointed, and so will take that battle to other forums instead.

notes from no w here
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Sun Dec 28th, 2008 at 09:03:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Frank Schnittger:
So your second comment is essentially correct - the EU - through Lisbon and the development of petition rights, greater qualified majority voting etc. - is in the process of moving from a a Union of Sovereign states, to a Union with a legal personality in its own rights, and some citizen rights deriving directly from that Union and not derived via the constitutions of the member states.


notes from no w here
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Sun Dec 28th, 2008 at 01:54:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Bottom line - you appear to be denying the democratic legitimacy of the European Parliament to speak for Europe on this issue.

Well, that's certainly true. Parliaments are not normally entitled to expand their own powers at the expense of the other branches of government... Not even when the EP happens to usually be the good guys in the Union.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Thu Jan 1st, 2009 at 07:38:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Top Diaries

Pentecost steam

by DoDo - May 20
11 comments

A Nomad's Life (A Farewell)

by Nomad - May 10
14 comments

Simple Solar Principles

by gmoke - May 17
2 comments

Rail News Blogging #24

by DoDo - May 12
11 comments

Ferguson hates on Keynes

by Migeru - May 6
100 comments

Occasional Series