The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Next June all EU member states go to the polls to elect a new European Parliament. Let us see how many anti-Lisbon members are elected then. Should the vast majority of European Parliament members elected then continue to support Lisbon will we then finally hear an end to the cant that Ireland is somehow more democratic that all other EU member states? I won't be holding my breath.
It is a implied falacy (there might be a better word, but it would not sound less strong) that voting for a pro-Lisbon party is the same as supporting the Lisbon treaty. Don't take my vote for the Labour Party as a support for Lisbon (which is what you are implicitly doing). The 70% or so people that vote for parties that are pro-Lisbon might (or might not be) pro-Lisbon themselves. In countries like .NL people voted on pro-Lisbon on local parliament and most probably will vote the same on the EP and AT THE SAME TIME voted no on Nice (and were not give the opportunity on Lisbon). What do you honestly think is the main sentiment in the UK about Lisbon?
You, on the other hand suggested that I belong to the same bunch as Libertas. I take that as offensive. While I might agree with their empty rethoric (surely not with their agenda) in some issues I have nothing to do with them. Or should I call you Frank Blair Brown Sarkozy Schnittger just because you agree with those characters on this issue?
It is a implied falacy (there might be a better word, but it would not sound less strong) that voting for a pro-Lisbon party is the same as supporting the Lisbon treaty. Don't take my vote for the Labour Party as a support for Lisbon (which is what you are implicitly doing).
It is equally possible that people voting for an anti-Lisbon party like the Tories don't have a particular problem with Lisbon insofar as they know or care one way or another. Bottom line - you appear to be denying the democratic legitimacy of the European Parliament to speak for Europe on this issue.
But much worse - from my point of view - you seem to be happy to allow a motley collection of bigots, fascists and neo-cons in Ireland - with 1% of EU population - to block a proposal you don't like even though it has been approved by Governments mandated to speak for their countries representing c. 95% of the population. That doesn't sound like democracy as I know it, even if the true figure for people specifically supporting Lisbon or knowing enough about it to care is much closer to 50%. notes from no w here
There is no European nation, nor European democracy. The EU is a sum of countries bound by a series of treaties. The Irish (or any country) have the right to say stop according to the rules accepted by all. There is no majority rule agreed. We never agreed to that to begin with.
The agreement in place is consensus based. Saying that we are an European democracy is false. The Irish (or the people of Cyprus, for that matter) have legitimacy to stop going foward because the accepted rules of the game are consensus based.
I am not saying it is good or bad. I am just saying that you are tweaking the existing rules and existing agreements to serve your point of view.
The current EU is not a majority based system, don't suggest that those are the rules of the game, they are not. Lisbon would not make it so by the way (there are a few needed minimums to makes things go forward).
I don't think I am trying to make any of the arguments you suppose: The EU of Nice or Lisbon is neither one political entity nor akin to the USA. It is still a Union of sovereign states who have pooled some sovereignty and are only beginning to develop the concept of European citizen ship rights as distinct from the rights from member state constitutions.
Citing you:
But much worse - from my point of view - you seem to be happy to allow a motley collection of bigots, fascists and neo-cons in Ireland - with 1% of EU population - to block a proposal you don't like even though it has been approved by Governments mandated to speak for their countries representing c. 95% of the population.
Yes, I am "happy" with it. The current rules of the game say that to change the rules of the games all countries (irrespective of size) have to agree. If one tiny country blocks it, then, tough luck. That is it.
You see, I strongly believe that the only civilized way for nations (and big groups of people in general) to relate among themselves is through respect of the law and existing agreements. I am, in principle, against tweaking the rules for my convinience. If, say, the parliament of Luxemburg would have voted 51/49 against it, again, though luck.
Of course, exceptions might be opened in extreme cases (say a military coup in one of the EU countries). And while the result of direct democracy in Ireland might have been influenced by people we find despicable, the process in Ireland is still a form of democracy.
While I respect representative democracy (and believe it is an acceptable way to ratify the treaty), the processes in countries which either had referenda for Nice and then no referenda for Lisbon (Spain, France, The Netherlands) or promised a referendum during representative elections and then failed to deliver it (at least Portugal) puts the situation on those countries on a very shaky grounds in terms of respect for democracy (irrespective of is is either representative or direct. The point here is that governments seem to be trying to avoid people to deliberate about that issue).
I don't see how one can say the process in Ireland was worse than in .ES/FR/NL/PT.
This has nothing to do with my opinion on the treaty (I am moderately against it. In fact I think I am most against it because of the contempt for "the people" that, in my personal opinion, was shown on the whole process).
PS - As a side, I think most people here see the european comission as a group of people which represent european social values. I think most are deluded. But that is another topic.
I am quite happy with the constitutional position in Ireland where changes in the Constitution require a referendum. I thought the YES side fought a lousy campaign last time around, but that is neither here nor there. The NO side ran an extremely effective scaremongering campaign such that many NO voters genuinely believed that Lisbon would usher in an era of abortion on demand, enforced secularisation, conscription into a European army etc. But that's Irish politics and it is OUR problem to resolve.
The major argument from the NO side which I object to (and which I thought relevant to raise with a European audience here) is that the NO campaigners claim to represent and speak on behalf of millions of anti-Lisbon people in other European countries. I object to this because:
So your second comment is essentially correct - the EU - through Lisbon and the development of petition rights, greater qualified majority voting etc. - is in the process of moving from a a Union of Sovereign states, to a Union with a legal personality in its own rights, and some citizen rights deriving directly from that Union and not derived via the constitutions of the member states.
Bottom line - you appear to be denying the democratic legitimacy of the European Parliament to speak for Europe on this issue.
Well, that's certainly true. Parliaments are not normally entitled to expand their own powers at the expense of the other branches of government... Not even when the EP happens to usually be the good guys in the Union.
- Jake If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.
by DoDo - May 20 11 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 14 comments
by gmoke - May 17 2 comments
by DoDo - May 12 11 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by DoDo - May 2011 comments
by gmoke - May 172 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1614 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1211 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments