Display:
redstar:
We give unmerited cover to neo-liberalism in particular, and liberalism in general, by insisting there is a difference between a "financial" economy and the "real" economy.

There is a difference.  

The financial economy is an intermediary layer between producers and consumers.

The big change is the emergence of direct "Peer to peer" connections. This is about to change the game IMHO and will disintermediate what is now an unnecessary layer.

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Thu Jan 1st, 2009 at 09:08:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Even there, there is need for allocation decisions to take place, at the firm level, albeit in a much more distributed, less centralised, way.

Fai de bèn a Bertrand, te lou rendra en cagant
by redstar on Thu Jan 1st, 2009 at 09:14:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Indeed.

The requirement is still there for providers of financial services. But as value adding partners, not as value extracting middlemen.

It's a market approach: but it's a market operating on a "Not for Loss" basis, rather than "For Profit". There is no "Profit" and no "Loss" within a partnership framework.

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Thu Jan 1st, 2009 at 10:36:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series