Display:
Flexicurity is a 'third way' concept. It's not necessarily completely bad if business pays its part for the security part, and it is also used to enact strong rules that increase security for temp workers.

In my not so humble opinion, social-democratic parties are backing this idea due to their highly dogmatic doctrine of full employment, which they can't let go of.

Full employment is just not a viable proposition in any capitalist system (whether French, Anglo-Saxon, or Rhine 'model'). Unless you dump your long-term jobless into the sick/disabled category and increase temp work, as the Dutch and British are wont to.

Your last question is, like, the mother of all questions. Let's have a debate.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Feb 11th, 2008 at 12:54:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Full employment is just not a viable proposition in any capitalist system

I'd like to read what you have to say about that. Diary?

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Feb 11th, 2008 at 02:38:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, soon, when I get even more time (so far I've fulfilled 50% of diaries promised, a decent quote if I may say so, but I'm looking to improve it).
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Feb 11th, 2008 at 03:21:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series