Display:
The entire framing of this article is insane, if we take the definition of insanity to be doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

I do have a better proposition: apologise for the string of cock-ups "we" in "the West" have perpetrated in assorted countries, decide on a set of principles for foreign policy and stick to them rather than lying through our teeth about "nation building"  (so long as the nations are happy to be vassals ) and "democracy" (so long as the democracy arrives at an answer "we" approve of). Pursue win-win solutions and take into account the legitimate interests of other counties and drop the macho bullshit that currently passes for diplomacy. Talk to anyone who wants to talk to us to see what we can do for each other rather than trying to insist they give us want we want before we even negotiate.

The author is writing as a representative and a member of NATO and "the West": it is in that capacity that I'm attacking him, as you should well know.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Mon Feb 11th, 2008 at 03:22:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Excellent propositions Colman! Personally have nothing against trying them but their execution will depend on people and given today's current crop of politicians and leaders, not to speak of an incredibly divided international community, who will or can do/execute them?

Re: "The author is writing as a representative and a member of NATO and "the West": it is in that capacity that I'm attacking him, as you should well know. "

OK, my fault; can't identify the author except that he joined NATO long after ISAF was deployed to Afghanistan. I honestly believe that he must be given credit for what he said about doing something in nation building; he's one of the military people I know who does not believe in a military solution being the only solution.

by The3rdColumn on Mon Feb 11th, 2008 at 03:38:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The author isn't the problem: the institution and its interactions with other institutions is. I doubt it's possible for NATO to do the job because it will never have the right priorities.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Mon Feb 11th, 2008 at 03:41:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
We are concentrating on NATO and their perceived 'inefficiency' but we must not forget that there are genuinely good thinking NGOs in Afghanistan, groups of civilian men and women from the four corners of the world who are trying very hard to bring progress in a ravaged nation.
by The3rdColumn on Mon Feb 11th, 2008 at 07:13:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Okay, off the top of my head:

NATION- BUILDING 101: what to do if you have fucked up?

1)    Announce that you're withdrawing after there are free and fair (representative) elections. Secure them while preparing to leave.

2)    Make sure the elected government is set up and ready to work. Use diplomacy to guarantee that neighboring states respect it (ideally: get their support).

3)    Negotiate a cooperation treaty with the new government, along the lines of debt relief, fair trade, military/ police training, logistical, development and humanitarian aid. Respect the deals made with the neighbors. Make conditions for any help given: democratic principles, a transparent budget, rule of law, separation of church and state. Set benchmarks for success.

4)    Set up a permanent body of diplomats, human rights watchers, governance advisers and aid workers, both WesternTM and local, to watch over the agreed rules and discuss arising problems.

5)    Get the soldiers out (maybe except for a small response force in the capital for a limited amount of time).

6)    Phase out remaining advisers and military personnel (depending on the benchmarks).

NOTE: Remember to adapt this strategy to the country in question. All major ethnic groups or "other powers" should be represented in the government, except for those totally opposed to the set conditions.

SIDE NOTE: Let me add that trade and development policies should always be tied in with foreign policy. The future representing and negotiating team for the EU should include both presidents (Commission and Council), both trade and development commissioners and be led by the HRCSFP.

"If you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles." Sun Tzu

by Turambar (sersguenda at hotmail com) on Mon Feb 11th, 2008 at 11:09:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series