Display:
Will leaving Afghanistan be the judicious thing to do today? If yes, why? If no, why not?

It's difficult to answer questions posed in a vacuum of surrounding facts.

My answer is no. The reason is that we should open unconditional negotiations with the Taliban. It's going to be hard to negotiate with all troops out today. It's going to take several months to get them out, anyway.

Now, is it likely that the US will support such negotiations? Not now. Might be if there's a completely different team in charge in 2009.

Until then, serve out the remaining missions, but do not extend them.

After negotiations have lead to a deal between the Northern Alliance and the Taliban, NATO should withdraw. Perhaps there should be a UN-led peacekeeping force, though it is hard to see what it could do. In any way, it should not comprise too many NATO countries, and none of the ones currently fighting.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Feb 11th, 2008 at 08:22:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I guess peacekeepers would do what peacekeepers have always done. Observe and report, report to all parties and the outside world. Even if all sides want peace, distrust lingers and minor scuffles or even accidents can start a new war.

So neutral observers can fill an important role.

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!

by A swedish kind of death on Tue Feb 19th, 2008 at 09:11:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series