Display:
 With portraits I always hesitate between a very tight framing and a more distant, environmental one...?

The following was a quick grab shot of a student of mine, while we met by chance when I was strolling around in the Luxembourg garden, as usual (manual focus with a 85/2)




"What can I do, What can I write, Against the fall of Night". A.E. Housman

by margouillat (hemidactylus(dot)frenatus(at)wanadoo(dot)fr) on Fri Feb 15th, 2008 at 06:58:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This framing works incredibly well.  I often find with portraits that because I may not always have enough light in which to shoot, that my depth of field is too small and not quite enough is in focus - I look at the photo afterwards and realise the nose is sharply focussed but not quite for the eyes.

Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Fri Feb 15th, 2008 at 09:18:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That's why I usually prefer manual focusing :-)

Then there is also that, with very shallow depth of field, you move a bit forward or backwards when pressing the shutter... It's imperceptible, but it's often there !

"What can I do, What can I write, Against the fall of Night". A.E. Housman

by margouillat (hemidactylus(dot)frenatus(at)wanadoo(dot)fr) on Fri Feb 15th, 2008 at 09:24:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Exactly, and I can't always quite spot the out of focus bits in the viewfinder or even on the LCD screen.  Then I zoom in on my computer and shout at myself for spoiling a good shot!

Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Fri Feb 15th, 2008 at 09:28:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Lovely lady with enchanting eyes. You really captured her "soul."

I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell. _ Blood Sweat & Tears
by Gringo (stargazing camel at aoldotcom) on Fri Feb 15th, 2008 at 09:49:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series