Display:
has been permanently destroyed.  

Repugs don't care and would not try.  

The 20th century truly was the American Century.  But eight years into the 21st, initiative has been squandered and has passed out of American hands.

But guess who will be the last to figure this out.  

The Fates are kind.

by Gaianne on Tue Feb 19th, 2008 at 03:07:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, don't take it for fully granted. USA, with all its faults, still has a terrific hand (remember its -huge, admittedly- debt is in dollars, and anyway it is too strong militarily for creditors to be too pushy, the English language still is a massive trump, as is the dominance of US law in business, giving lots of work to US consulting and law firms...).

It is misplaying that hand with a vengeance, true, and at the moment it's tough to see a way back. But it's not that long ago that we could not easily see how the initiative would get away from USA.

With a truly progressive policy of healthcare, education for all and reductions of inequalities, coupled with a massive national infrastructure program to improve energy self-sufficiency, therefore reduce military spending and probably get massive market shares in the sustainable development market that is bound to appear one day (or else...), they could achieve a lot. Besides, they would have the luxury of being able to decide when the said markets appear. Almost at the press of a button.

They still have massive assets. But all of them, to be used, will require reversing the crazy ideology that has been paraded for 40 years.

Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi

by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Tue Feb 19th, 2008 at 03:23:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The US have great assets and, correctly managed, it has all the potential to restore itself as the top superpower by far. It has space, material resources, an extensive infrastructure in poor shape but that can be fixed, a lot of nice left-overs from its industrial glory days, and, above all, it has a great demography, very balanced compared to the rest of the world.

But I don't see the US military "strength" as an asset but rather as a severe liability. It's a parasite on the economy and the government and, by maintaining the illusion of strength, it's a major roadblock obstacle on the USA #1 priority : reconnection with reality.

by Francois in Paris on Tue Feb 19th, 2008 at 01:46:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
With a truly progressive policy of healthcare, education for all and reductions of inequalities, coupled with a massive national infrastructure program to improve energy self-sufficiency, therefore reduce military spending and probably get massive market shares in the sustainable development market that is bound to appear one day (or else...), they could achieve a lot.  

Theoretically, a reversal of policy could achieve much, until you consider that the reasons the US abandoned sustainable energy policy in 1980 are the same reasons it will not go back to it now.  It is crucial to note that there is not enough sustainable energy in any form to power our civilization;  sustainable energy implies the RADICAL transformation of that civilization, including not just conservation and reduction of resource use, but the end of capitalism and debt-based money.  

Meanwhile, practically speaking, the window is closing:  Year 2008 may well be the year when the US is revealed as bankrupt.  After that, nothing will be done.  

The Fates are kind.

by Gaianne on Tue Feb 19th, 2008 at 04:15:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, you talk as if Vietnam never happened, the Paris riots, etc.

I lived in Europe during the Reagan era.

This is the nadir with Bush, but I don't see a huge change. There never was a deep pro-US sentiment in Europe. Not in my time in Europe anyway.

by Upstate NY on Tue Feb 19th, 2008 at 11:02:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks for your obsevations.  

I remember Vietnam, and left it out for reasons of simplicity.  But you are right:  As early as the 1970s  one could see that the American Century would likely be ending, in effect by choice.  

There is indeed a progression from there to the atrocities of this century, and disenchantment has been a gradual process with many events along the way.  

The Fates are kind.

by Gaianne on Tue Feb 19th, 2008 at 04:20:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Here it is rather convincing written that Washington all the time expected the Europeans to follow.
An exerpt:
"Europeans, I was told, always loudly disagree with US proposals but, in the end, whether it be expanding NATO or recognizing an independent Kosovo, will acquiesce to what America insists upon. At the same time, the US can continue to have fundamental disagreements with its European partners over matters such as climate change policy or international law without causing any major damage to the relationship."

Der Amerikaner ist die Orchidee unter den Menschen
Volker Pispers
by Martin (weiser.mensch(at)googlemail.com) on Tue Feb 19th, 2008 at 05:03:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series