European Tribune

Display:
Yes, interesting book, says that theres a tacit identical three way split of the defence budget between the three services, so a reorganisation of the army or airforce would need to be resource intensive to maintain the respective status of senior officers. also contains much discussion of the ineptitude of the British defence industry, (Especially BAe)

Life should consist in at least fifty percent pure waste of time, and the rest doing what you please.
by ceebs (bunchofwankers (at) gmail (dot) com) on Thu Feb 21st, 2008 at 08:13:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That should be an interesting read. Thanks for the tip -- will ask my baby boy to get me a copy (for my birthday.)
by The3rdColumn on Thu Feb 21st, 2008 at 08:33:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
On MoD budget cuts -- MoD is facing serious 'charges' that troops sent to fight in Iraq and Afghanisan do so with no proper equipment. Brown's cost cutting measures when he was chancellor were responsible for the pathetic state of the British Army.

by The3rdColumn on Thu Feb 21st, 2008 at 08:37:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well if he dosn't, email me an address and I'll throw it in the post.

Life should consist in at least fifty percent pure waste of time, and the rest doing what you please.
by ceebs (bunchofwankers (at) gmail (dot) com) on Thu Feb 21st, 2008 at 08:44:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Why, thank you! Very sweet of you. Promise to keep you posted.
by The3rdColumn on Thu Feb 21st, 2008 at 08:48:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
What's gobsmacking is why the MoD insists on the JSF, clearly, a US cold war elephant. The JSF, at $276 billion, is reported to be the Pentagon's most expensive weapon, and is said to consume some 90 percent of the money the Pentagon is spending on new fighter jets. US defence industry giant Lockheed Martin is running it in conjuction with international funding and industrial participation with Britain topping the list of the international funders and industrial participants.

Do we really need this aircraft? Almost certainly not. It may perform far ahead of any competition but by the time anyone else (China, India or perhaps Russia?) gets to this level we will be using UAVs for almost all dangerous mission anyway!

by The3rdColumn on Fri Feb 22nd, 2008 at 11:00:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This is why Arms Control Treaties are important.

The US has been working on the JSF, and it's bigger and badder (and canceled) cousin the F-22 Raptor, since the 80's.  I remember playing games in 1990 that featured them.

With a 30-year development timeframe, it's not terribly practical to wait until there's an actual threat to start building cutting edge military aircraft.  So, it's understandable why planners would keep working on these things, as it's always sort of hard to predict what's going to be needed in 30 years.

A proper conventional forces treaty, if signed by all the major powers, kills this dynamic entirely.

Of course, Russia and China are not terribly likely to be interested in such a treaty, given how anything that locked the powers into the status quo would lock them into a permanent subordinate position.

by Zwackus on Fri Feb 22nd, 2008 at 09:23:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
The Purpose of Education
by rdf - Nov 20
25 comments

In Defense of the Electoral College
by danps - Nov 22
9 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
20 comments

LQD: NATO as 'convenient threat' for Russia
by marco - Nov 21
26 comments

jitter noise rumble
by emilmoller - Nov 19
18 comments

LQD: The real orgasmic Puritans
by Ted Welch - Nov 20
36 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
122 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
58 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series