Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

This NATO adventure in Afghanistan is not popular among the population.
Yesterday, the Dutch Defence published the latest poll(PDF)

Ministerie van defensie - Nieuws Ministry of Defence - News
Defensie peilt maandelijks de steun en het draagvlak voor de missie in Afghanistan onder de Nederlandse bevolking door middel van verschillende vragen en stellingen. De uitslagen van de meting in februari zijn inmiddels bekend. Defence gauges monthly aid and support for the mission in Afghanistan under the Dutch population through various questions. The results of measurement in February are now known.
Het percentage van de Nederlandse bevolking dat aangeeft dat de missie zal bijdrage aan de wederopbouw (32%) en het percentage dat er vertrouwen in heeft dat de Nederlandse militairen zijn opgewassen tegen Talibanstrijders (35%), zijn lager dan in de voorafgaande maand (47% en 53%).The percentage of the Dutch population indicating that the mission will contribute to the reconstruction (32%) and the percentage that are confident that the Dutch soldiers are up against Talibanfighters (35%) are lower than in the previous month (47 % and 53%).

The politicians decide what will happen.
But they have to be (re)elected now and then.

With public support that low no one European politician can afford to be hawkish on the matter.

OTOH, they do not have the courage to cut the whole military operation.

The struggle of man against tyranny is the struggle of memory against forgetting.(Kundera)

by Elco B (elcob at scarlet dot be) on Sat Feb 23rd, 2008 at 11:10:26 AM EST
Thanks for the latest Dutch poll. Very interesting.

With public support that low no one European politician can afford to be hawkish on the matter.

OTOH, they do not have the courage to cut the whole military operation.

That's their damn cowardice that I find soooo annoying.

If European politicians think that Afghanistan is not important to our security, then they should withdraw regardless of what the US think. The US is unhappy anyway.

OR:

If European politicians think the ISAF mission is vital, then they should support it full heartedly regardless of how unpopular it is. And with full support I do not mean to send troops to the US disposal, but to actually work out a decent strategy and convince other NATO states to support it. There is always more than just support or objection of US policy.

But the current policy should not be continued.
Perhaps an Afghanistan Study Group would help our politicians to make up their mind: Withdrawal or a change of strategy combined with more resources. One or the other rather than muddling throught to disasater.

by Joerg in Berlin ((joerg.wolf [AT] atlanticreview.org)) on Sat Feb 23rd, 2008 at 03:04:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I totally agree on European governments' hypocrisy. However, I do not agree that it is unrelated to the US: methinks the motivation for this hypocritical policy is an alibi demonstration of fealthy to the US so as to not get into too much trouble with them.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Feb 23rd, 2008 at 03:24:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
@ Dodo
I don't know what "fealthy" means, but I am confidant enough to say that this alibi demonstration is not achieving what is supposed to: Europe is "in trouble" with the US.
by Joerg in Berlin ((joerg.wolf [AT] atlanticreview.org)) on Sat Feb 23rd, 2008 at 03:27:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Without the typo: fealty = Lehenstreue.

I wrote "not get into too much trouble with" the US.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Sun Feb 24th, 2008 at 10:17:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks, I got it.

I still think it is not working.

by Joerg in Berlin ((joerg.wolf [AT] atlanticreview.org)) on Sun Feb 24th, 2008 at 08:18:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Occasional Series