Display:
Good point.

Perhaps one Study Group Recommendation shall be to eliminate all national caveats.

Why do NATO states have these national caveats anyway?
Isn't NATO supposed to operate under unity of command? And only the French our outside NATO's military structure?

National caveats and the NATO's principles of unity of command seem to contradict themselves, but I have probably forgotten everything I learned in NATO 101.

I guess, the mistake was made right at the beginning, when NATO decided that every major member country gets a providence in Afghanistan...

This was done on the Balkans as well, and it seemed to work, but isn't it all against the NATO principles?

by Joerg in Berlin ((joerg.wolf [AT] atlanticreview.org)) on Sat Feb 23rd, 2008 at 03:11:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
@ Joerg:

"when NATO decided that every major member country gets a providence in Afghanistan"

What do you mean by this?  You mean the mistake is saying that every major country gets some kind of say at the strategic level in Afghanistan?

Kyle Atwell

by Kyle Atwell (kyle.atwell [at] atlanticreview.org) on Sun Feb 24th, 2008 at 03:02:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I was referring to the NATO decision to divide Afghanistan into several sectors and then assign them to individual or a group of NATO countries.
by Joerg in Berlin ((joerg.wolf [AT] atlanticreview.org)) on Sun Feb 24th, 2008 at 08:12:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series