Display:
the Nato mission in Afghanistan," wouldn't it be a good idea to make sure we all agree what this mission is and, assuming we can agree, determine whether it is worth in fact saving?

Fai de bèn a Bertrand, te lou rendra en cagant
by redstar on Sat Feb 23rd, 2008 at 07:58:52 PM EST
"to make sure we all agree"

No, thanks. I don't like communism. ;-)

Seriously: Replace "NATO mission" with the "Western efforts in Afghanistan" and then ask you yourself if an international Afghanistan study group is needed to improve the current state of affairs in Afghanistan. See the poll.

by Joerg in Berlin ((joerg.wolf [AT] atlanticreview.org)) on Sun Feb 24th, 2008 at 06:27:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well make it "come up with a few possible definitions of what the mission might be" and then see if any of them are achievable....

But seriously, are there any examples in the past of a study group, international or otherwise, coming up with a solution that worked for an insurgency of this sort (other than "get the hell out of there"). If not, what reason is there for expecting that it would be any difference in Afghanistan?

by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Sun Feb 24th, 2008 at 01:00:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series