European Tribune

Display:
Just because a husband and wife fight, it does not mean they should divorce.

Not necessarily, but if the husband starts saying things like "Western Europe, you're such an old bitch! The hot new chick down the block, Eastern Europe, she knows how to treat a man right!", at the very least a couple of therapy sessions might be in order. Or a slap in the face.

Anyway, I would expect a certain honeymoon period for the next president, but whether he or she can restore American credibility to pre-Bush levels remains to be seen. One would think the lesson learned from the past eight years is that placing so much power into the hands of so few people is a recipe for disaster. It's not so much about the best person to occupy that office, as it is about the worst person to occupy it. What are we all gonna do when Jeb Bush defeats a Carterised Obama four years from now?

As for McCain and Europe...he has all but promised that "there will be more wars", a point of view that's not like to go over well with...well, anyone. He may be against torture, but it seems he's essentially in agreement with the central tenets of the Bush doctrine.  If he's the president, I wouldn't want "reconciliation".

"The basis of optimism is sheer terror" - Oscar Wilde

by NordicStorm on Sat Feb 23rd, 2008 at 04:23:40 PM EST
I am interested by your suggestion that the US would be the abusive husband.  Your comment seems to reflect an assumption that the US has been the source of all tensions in US/European relations... I do not know if this was your intention, but one thing I have learned in my discussions between Americans and Europeans is that both sides have pretty severe grievances and feelings of let down from the other.  

Not sure what you mean by "Carterised Obama"?

As for McCain and Europe...he has all but promised that "there will be more wars"

I agree... McCain is a little too trigger happy for my comfort.  I mean, it is one thing to say that you will support a strike against Iran if it manages to develop nuclear weapons or is imminently close.  But what kind of idiot sings a song going, "bomb bomb Iran"?


Kyle Atwell

by Kyle Atwell (kyle.atwell [at] atlanticreview.org) on Sun Feb 24th, 2008 at 12:08:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, I was mostly riffing on the analogy. It was an oblique reference to the run-up of the Iraq war and Rumsfeld's division of Europe into "new" (read: "acquiescent") and "old".

"The basis of optimism is sheer terror" - Oscar Wilde
by NordicStorm on Mon Feb 25th, 2008 at 05:30:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Kyle Atwell:
I am interested by your suggestion that the US would be the abusive husband.  
Don't get me started on the way the US treats its NATO allies.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Feb 28th, 2008 at 05:09:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My gripe with these nice husband-wife comparisons is that there aren't just two partners in NATO. If the allieance would be between the USA and the EU, that would be interesting. But as things stand, we are the USA's harem of pigmy women. I am not interested in the gripes of the pasha.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Thu Feb 28th, 2008 at 05:42:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
The Purpose of Education
by rdf - Nov 20
25 comments

In Defense of the Electoral College
by danps - Nov 22
9 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
20 comments

LQD: NATO as 'convenient threat' for Russia
by marco - Nov 21
26 comments

jitter noise rumble
by emilmoller - Nov 19
18 comments

LQD: The real orgasmic Puritans
by Ted Welch - Nov 20
34 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
122 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
58 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series