Display:
If Afghanistan goes south they can point to Gates warning and place the blame on the Europeans.
If not no one will remember.
Today everybody knows that Saddam is to blame for the invasion because he just wouldn't say that he had no WMDs.

Wait this is important. Someone is wrong on the Internet.
by generic on Fri Feb 8th, 2008 at 09:36:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Just like when you have a US broadsheet like TWSJ trying hard to bury the Iraq issue...

Blocking Blair -THE WALL STREET JOURNAL EUROPE and write:

It's a curious time to renew the Iraq debate, just as the U.S. surge has put al Qaeda on the defensive and allowed for slow but sure political progress in Baghdad. Events on the ground make the antiwar crowd's narrative of a "disastrous" invasion less plausible almost daily. So it's compensating by repeating its claims of catastrophe until the public believes they're true.
by The3rdColumn on Fri Feb 8th, 2008 at 10:45:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series