Display:
Generic, stuff you quote mining up yours.
by Francois in Paris on Sun Mar 2nd, 2008 at 11:07:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You clearly stated that the US could have won the Vietnam war if they had gone all out. I don't think I have taken that out of context.
How do you propose the US could have won the war other than by nuclear carpet bombing? After Diem was assassinated there was really no significant support for the US in South Vietnam left. Also when dealing with the North there was the very real danger of drawing the Chinese into a full scale conflict.

Wait this is important. Someone is wrong on the Internet.
by generic on Mon Mar 3rd, 2008 at 09:25:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I've clearly stated that was no reason whatsoever to do it.

They and the soviets had a reason against Germany and the the US alone against Japan. They went all out and they won.

by Francois in Paris on Tue Mar 4th, 2008 at 01:20:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Francois in Paris:
I've clearly stated that was no reason whatsoever to do it.

I never implied that you had.
I simply disagree that the war could have been won, independently of any reason for or commitment to the war.
WW2 ended with the surrender of Germany and Japan. The Vietcong as an organization couldn't be made to surrender. To win Vietnam the Vietcong would have had to be destroyed, because there really was no other political faction that had any popular support whatsoever. The Vietcong couldn't be destroyed without an invasion of the North. Said invasion probably would have brought nuclear armed China into the war.

Wait this is important. Someone is wrong on the Internet.
by generic on Tue Mar 4th, 2008 at 12:46:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series