European Tribune

Display:
Incidentially, what's wrong with just using a timer to water them?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Sat Mar 15th, 2008 at 10:11:13 AM EST
I'm not sure about the timer.  Here are our thoughts to date:

A singled zoned timer would feed all the tubs in the same amount of water, wasting a fair amount. With the heavy drinkers were getting their fill and the lighter ones spitting water out of their reservoirs and on to the roof.  On hot days some tubs were drinking several gallons of water while others took next to nothing.

Would a zoned timer system be flexible enough to adjust to a yearly "crop" rotation?

I only know the basics of how irrigation systems work.  They seem more complicated than the siphon.  I'd like to do what ever is easiest/cheapest.  

by Bruce F (greenroofgrowers [at] gmail [dot] com) on Sat Mar 15th, 2008 at 10:57:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That's another plus of big, mixed containers - they tend to average out consumption.

I suppose it depends on whether you want/need full automation or not. I have the feeling that the siphon solution is going to be a pain to keep primed. Maybe if you grouped tubs and linked them so all the tubs in a group had a common water level? I use a gravity fed system to keep the greenhouse and beds watered on a timer from a rainwater barrel, but I don't expect total automation - I tweak the output as I go and supplement where necessary.

Most irrigation systems will allow you adjust the output from each nozzle independently.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Sat Mar 15th, 2008 at 11:04:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I was planning on setting up a single timer daisy-chained  fill system for the water reservoirs on my balcony. With an end-fill off switch built out of a mechanical switch and a float. Like this:

Fills the left most tub first, then the others down the chain, until it is shut off by the switch being activated by the floaty thingi.
I've gotten as far as getting a few containers and starting to make some holes, so we'll see how far this really goes...
by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Sat Mar 15th, 2008 at 01:02:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Why don't you just use a mechanical thingy from a toilet in the first reservoir or something?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Sat Mar 15th, 2008 at 01:15:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I was planning on using a Hudson valve for that.  It's designed especially for this kind of situation and it's relatively cheap.
by Bruce F (greenroofgrowers [at] gmail [dot] com) on Sat Mar 15th, 2008 at 02:16:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I saw that, then forgot.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Sat Mar 15th, 2008 at 02:25:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't want to join the reservoirs by pipes at the bottom as then a small leak that form might encourage a larger leak, and continously put out water. The last tube with the float should really be linked by the top as well, and have a tiny hole at the bottom. Then the water starts up every now and again, ensuring everything is filled, the final tube fills up, the stop switch is triggered, and the last tube empties slowly, expelling a small amount of liquid. The system is then ready to go for the next fillup.
by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Sat Mar 15th, 2008 at 03:22:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Eh? A toilet valve is at the top of the reservoir. Just link them all at the top level.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Sat Mar 15th, 2008 at 03:25:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Putting the toilet valve in the last one? Then there is an issue that the containers earlier in the chain may empty first and the refill not be triggered in the last one until too late. This may not be an actual problem, just one I imagine.
by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Sat Mar 15th, 2008 at 03:30:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
First one, where the water enters the system.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Sat Mar 15th, 2008 at 03:32:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Recent Diaries
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series