European Tribune

Display:
I think you ignore the class analysis - it is not so much a case moral probity or intellectual foresight - of people being angels - as of their objective interests being at variance.  Keynesians got away with bridging that divide so long as everybody could be a winner.  They could describe themselves as centrists then - whereas now, in the US, they are so far out liberals - you can't get a PhD in any University based on Keynesian ideas.

The political centre has moved so far to the right, that only the out and out class warriors are at the centre of it.  Basically the rich have been able to reverse the New Deal and re-assign the political system to themselves.  The problem is not with the economics, but with the realities of the political order, and only a political revolution can change that.

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Thu Mar 13th, 2008 at 11:42:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
We've already had a political revolution. That's what the Right did when they dug up Friedman and waved him around like a decomposing scarecrow, and funded any number of think tanks to do the evangelial work needed to sell his reform message.

It was a very quiet revolution, but effective because - as Techno says - the Keynesians had weaknesses. In the middle of an energy crisis it was easy to throw out the Keynesian message and replace it with monetarist crankiness.

Now we've had twenty years of crank economics flopping around incontinently in the mainstream, with the inevitable hilarious results.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Mar 13th, 2008 at 10:56:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series