European Tribune

Display:
You're a brave man writing under this title given the Poemless Polemic and our leader's strictures against anyone using the C word.  I'm not sure I agree with much of what you say, but that doesn't mean I won't defend your right to say it, although perhaps the timing could have been better, given the hurt feelings already engendered by the use of that term.  I think I'll stay out of this one if you don't mind.  Ex-communication is a standard sanction amongst cults!!!

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 11:51:58 AM EST
Yes, the title is provocative given what's happened in the last few days. Perhaps "Cult of ET" might have been more politic.

Just as ideology is better than dogma. I dunno, something happened last night and it's gonna take a while for everyone's reactions to filter through. I imagine that comments are gonna be thin on the groud for a while.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 12:02:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I must admit that I had not quite realised how nasty that spat had been when I posted this diary. My browser borked partway through loading the page, so I didn't get all the comments - and I didn't have the patience for a 100+ comment thread so I didn't refresh it.

I am not sure "cult" is a more flattering description than "church" though :-P

- Jake

Ceterum censeo Chicago esse delendam

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 12:33:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Change it to cult. That way I can front-page it at some stage.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 12:35:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
So its official then, is it?  The church word is not allowed and will disqualify a diary from promotion?

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 12:39:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, absolutely. That's exactly what I meant. Well done there Frank. Good man.

What I meant was that it might  impolitic of me to promote that title to the front-page in the current context. No need to kick people that are feeling bruised already.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 12:50:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Glad to be of service old chap...

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:21:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Thank you for the advice (and for the FP "nomination"). I have decidedly mixed feelings about your suggestion, though.

  • First, to anyone not involved in the above mentioned threadjack, "cult" is a much harsher accusation than "church" - and hopefully the basic, underlying discussion will endure longer than the memory of recent semantic disagreements.

  • Second, I intensely dislike making changes in already published material - particularly in the title - without making it clear that an edit has been made. Making the nature of the edit clear would kind of defeat its purpose of it, and the alternative would feel uncomfortably like memory-holing uncomfortable ideas.

  • Third:

If this is mostly an editorial thing w.r.t. some possible future FP'ing, I really think that such editorial changes should be made by the FP'er who republishes it, along with a note such as "Title edited for FP" (similar to the "Fold moved/inserted for FP" notes). That would make it clear to all concerned which parts of the diary have been edited specifically to make it FP compliant.

If it is a moderation request, I will of course comply. But I assume that it is not, because I didn't see the [ET moderation technology] tag anywhere in the comment.

If it is simply general advice on the making of readable diaries, rather than one of the above, then I must respectfully decline to follow it for the reasons stated in bullets 1 and 2.

- Jake

Ceterum censeo Chicago esse delendam

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:07:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Moderation request? Gods no
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:11:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
<snark> [ET Moderation Technology™]

Please don't use the G word.</snark>

It'd be nice if the battle were only against the right wingers, not half of the left on top of that — François in Paris

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:13:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
While I like snark as much as the next guy, I dislike having to second-guess moderators and other law-enforcement officials. If you're making requests in your capacity as moderator, I will make the changes even if I disagree with your reasoning. If you are making suggestions as a member of the community, I will make the changes if I believe them to be justified.

- Jake

Ceterum censeo Chicago esse delendam

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:38:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Believe me, if I was making a moderation request I'd make it very, very clear that that was the case.

I don't generally get all that attached to titles, so changing one doesn't seem like a big deal to me.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:49:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks for the clarification.

I'm not particularly attached to the title as such. But I am attached to the principle of not airbrushing my diaries when I put my foot in my mouth.

- Jake

Ceterum censeo Chicago esse delendam

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 02:02:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Colman:
don't generally get all that attached to titles

"Put not your trust in Princes..." and all that?

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 02:04:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Just rename it to "ET eats babies".

It'd be nice if the battle were only against the right wingers, not half of the left on top of that — François in Paris
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:11:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I like that. What evidence do we have for that though?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:12:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I had an egg this moring.  If it's true for me, it must be true for everyone here.  Obviously.  Since we're all on the same page and everything.

Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
by poemless on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:30:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
True, true.

Sam currently has a baby in her belly, so she must have eaten one, so that's more evidence.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:32:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
are babies the only people you eat for breakfast?

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 02:20:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
At the moment, yes.

Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
by poemless on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 02:57:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And are said babies male or female?  You know what they say, "dead girl or live boy" and all that.

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
by Drew J Jones (blahblahblah@blahblahblah.com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:31:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well:

(a) the "C" word is in quotes; and

(b) it's on the Diary header, so, like the "18 years and above" disclaimers on the sex-shop windows, it's only consenting adults who should venture inside!

Jake, have you got any astrology in the back room......? ;-)

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 12:13:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Jake, have you got any astrology in the back room......? ;-)

Ah, right, I'd forgotten astrology on my list of crankery in point 2c :-P

Thanks for reminding me.

- Jake

Ceterum censeo Chicago esse delendam

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 12:41:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'll defend anyone's right to say anything.  (Ask anyone here who has seen me get passionate about freedom of speech issues.) But that doesn't make them correct.

I have never told anyone they can't say anything.  I've only said
1)ET is not a church of any sort, even the secular sort, and
2)I belong to no church and please stop harassing me

That's not censorship.  That's me talking about me and me disagreeing with those who would assume I share their belief system - even if it is a secular one.  

Write about churches until your brain explodes if you like.  But just don't say that poemless belongs to one.  If you want to finagle the definition of church so that it applies to ET- fine- (I'm going by the OED myself, but respect a person's artistic rights), but again, having the right to say something does not de facto make whatever you say true or fair.

Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.

by poemless on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 12:37:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And the funny thing is that I suspect virtually everyone here agrees with you, has very little time for Churches of any kind, and would, at best, accept the phrase "broad church" as a metaphor for a "wide ranging community" and not in any literal sense.  So I supposed the question should be rephrased: "Just how wide ranging a community is ET?"  How tolerant are we of diversity, or are there a set of semi-hidden norms which must be obeyed if you don't want to attract a lot of flack.  "I wouldn't want to be in a club that wants me as a member" -Groucho Marx

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:08:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

"broad church" as a metaphor for a "wide ranging community"

It's a misleading, and worse, unnecessary metaphor, even if somewhere on this planet it is commonly used.  Placing an adjective in front of a noun doesn't change the essence of the noun; it only narrows its definition.   There are infinite differences between communities and churches.  All churches may be communities but that does not mean all communities are churches.  If you want to say community - say community.  Don't say church.  Language may be a form of creative expression, but even then, it has to communicate ideas effectively.  Which is why, when we see a cat, we don't say, "look at the cute puppy!"  People would say, "where?  what are you talking about?"  "Oh, you know what I mean.  It has four legs and fur and is a pet. puppy, cat, whatever."  You have a right to say "puppy," but should expect others to be frustrated and confused when you do.  

Is ET a community.  Sure, to varying degrees for different people.  But communities don't have to share a set of beliefs.  Just norms.  Agree to some rules so no one gets killed.  This isn't rocket science.

Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.

by poemless on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:26:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually it's not strictly a metaphor but an idiom, which is the core of the issue: if you're not familiar with the idiom it sounds very strange.

You're saying that ET should be catholic in the beliefs it accepts?

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:31:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You're saying that ET should be catholic in the idioms it accepts?

Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
by poemless on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:37:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Life should consist in at least fifty percent pure waste of time, and the rest doing what you please.
by ceebs (bunchofwankers (at) gmail (dot) com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:45:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Who's that on the picture?

(Also, can we take the semantic quibbles somewhere else? Yes, "broad church" is a poorly chosen ideom, yes the accusation that someone belongs to a church is borderline insulting if the accused is an anti-clericalist (as I happen to be, for the record), and yes, making a miswording into 100+ post thread is making a mountain out of a molehill.)

- Jake

Ceterum censeo Chicago esse delendam

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:52:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That might be Ian Paisley?

It'd be nice if the battle were only against the right wingers, not half of the left on top of that — François in Paris
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 02:07:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That is the Rev Ian Paisley, who's probably most famous in the rest of Europe for Standing up in the European Parliament and Heckling The former pope. He's a somewhat extreme protestant.

Life should consist in at least fifty percent pure waste of time, and the rest doing what you please.
by ceebs (bunchofwankers (at) gmail (dot) com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 02:08:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
and he doesn't like catholic idioms either....

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 02:22:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I know who Paisley is. Can't recall seeing his picture, though. An advantage and disadvantage of the only semi-reliable news in Denmark being on the radio is that I don't get much feeling for how politicians look.

- Jake

Ceterum censeo Chicago esse delendam

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 02:52:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well theres a face to match with the sound of bigot.

Life should consist in at least fifty percent pure waste of time, and the rest doing what you please.
by ceebs (bunchofwankers (at) gmail (dot) com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 03:06:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Frank Schnittger:
"I wouldn't want to be in a club that wants me as a member" -Groucho Marx

reading that, came across this yesterday which I thought needed sharing, and you've saved me from writing a diary.

What's So Funny and Why: What's So Funny? Issue: Sarah Lawrence College Magazine

The late comedian Groucho Marx, famous for his quick wit, performed some of his best work in 1958 on a pile of East Berlin rubble for an audience of five.

Among the five was Judith Dwan Hallet '64, then 16 and the daughter of Robert Dwan, the long-time director of Groucho's radio and TV shows. She and her father, along with Marx's wife and 11-year-old daughter, had accompanied him on the tour of Europe. In Dornum, the German town where Marx's mother had been born, the travelers discovered that the Nazis had obliterated all Jewish graves, and removed from the local church the old register of inhabitants from his parents' generation. Marx hired a car with a chauffeur, and told the driver to take the group to Adolph Hitler's grave in Berlin.

It was surprisingly easy to get there. The car slipped through a checkpoint into a devastated gray and brown city of people in solemn clothing. Marx told the chauffer to drive to the bunker where Hitler was said to have committed suicide, where he was supposedly still buried.

The rubble at the site was about 20 feet high. Wearing his characteristic beret but without the trademark cigar, Marx alone climbed the side of the debris. When he reached the top, he stood still for a moment. Then he launched himself, unsmiling, into a frenetic Charleston. The dance on Hitler's grave lasted a minute or two.

"Nobody applauded," Hallet says. "Nobody laughed."



Life should consist in at least fifty percent pure waste of time, and the rest doing what you please.
by ceebs (bunchofwankers (at) gmail (dot) com) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:29:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series