With that one it shouldn't be to hard :-) But then I've never went so wide on film ! "What can I do, What can I write, Against the fall of Night". A.E. Housman
That's the second roll where I've managed to fog up the negatives at some stage, probably loading the film.
Once, I even put it in the freezer part... For what I thought was few minutes. At the end of the developer pouring in the tank, I heard and felt a "thunk"... Looking in the bottle, there was a white pancake of the active solution that couldn't go through the bottle neck... The film was already wet with something that was mainly water!!! In a frantic move, with a screwdriver, I broke the pancake to smaller bits, took them out, shoved them in the tank (in full dark), agitated... And invented on the spot a development time that neared tin-foil nerdism !
Those negatives was an important work and there was 6 rolls in the tank... Some time after, and after the fixing part, I got the negatives out with trembling hands... And they were far from perfect but usable under the enlarger (with some work) !
The client was happy and I learned a lesson :-) "What can I do, What can I write, Against the fall of Night". A.E. Housman
It definitely wasn't cool. But it was a real camera for more-or-less the price of the fixed-focus, fixed-exposure plastic boxes my friends had.
I definitely got better pictures than they did. But as I became a short-sighted and glasses-averse teenager, my speciality-and priority-became adjusting the settings to get maximum depth of field...
I'm still saving for an Elmarit 24mm ASPH, but at the current rate I'll be dead first... http://en.leica-camera.com/photography/m_system/lenses/2179.html
It looks very much like item 19 on this list (although the picture is of an M4). http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.leicaphiliosis.com/Leicap21.jpg&imgrefurl=http ://www.leicaphiliosis.com/thecollection.htm&h=591&w=816&sz=40&hl=en&start=4& tbnid=sbINjMoadDYDEM:&tbnh=104&tbnw=144&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsummilux%2B35mm%26gbv%3D2%26h l%3Den%26safe%3Doff
I had to sell all of it at that time, as it didn't cover my needs ( macro, reproduction, models, etc.) and I got an F4s Nikon (big change in size).
Now I'm more in the M mood (or Bessa or...), but, even if I had the money (ah, those grown-up kids and their studies :-) ), I would still hesitate between an MP or an M8, i.e. between a film or digital variant !
I still need to have the pictures for work quickly and in a digital format, not to speak of the sheer quantity of "out of interest" pictures of a building or of a site, to keep track of details for future work...! A P&S would do it too, but then I would loose the habit of having a "good" camera with me and would revert to sloppy pictures (I'm already lazy enough :-) )!
My seasoned D200 is good with my old lenses, and I'll keep it that way until something changes (Loto, prices going down, unexpected inheritance, etc.) :-) "What can I do, What can I write, Against the fall of Night". A.E. Housman
I get my pictures developed at the local drugstore, which does a fine job of developing the film, a mediocre job of printing, and a barely-adequate-for-the-web job of scanning. But at least I have now a good backup. So my shoeboxes full of unsorted pictures from last week and from decades ago are sitting there in the closet waiting for me to get some enthusiasm for sorting.
Where will everybody's digital pix be in 30 years?
