Display:
Film with a rating of ISO 200 needs half as much light to form a good image as does film rated at ISO 400.

Is there a mistake in this sentence, or does "higher ISO" means lower number, or am I not awake yet to comment on technical matters?

Great tutorial, BTW. Helps clarify my misformed notions that came from a physics rather than photography viewpoint.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères

by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Fri Mar 21st, 2008 at 06:24:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Higher ISO is a higher number.

For a film camera, a bright day would use ISO 100.  An overcast day would use ISO 400 which needs less light to capture a photo with.  

With digital you can get very large ISO numbers for night shots and very low light but it does get very grainy eg at ISO 1600.

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Fri Mar 21st, 2008 at 06:28:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And I think Colman meant to put ISO 200 needs twice as much light as ISO 400.

Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Fri Mar 21st, 2008 at 06:29:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, of course I did. Thanks. Can't edit the comment of course.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Mar 21st, 2008 at 08:26:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You were checking that we were paying attention weren't you?!

Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Fri Mar 21st, 2008 at 08:42:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes. Yes I was.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Mar 21st, 2008 at 08:44:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
All the best teachers do it.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Mar 21st, 2008 at 10:20:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series