European Tribune

Display:
The false dichotomy I see in this diary is between helping everyone a litte -not enough- and a few people a lot.  It is a false dichotomy because it rests on the assumption that there are limited resources.  There are only limited resources because we've collectively agreed that there are.  For some reason it is acceptable to suggest that the most desperate among us be denied the most basic necessities, but political suicide to suggest that the vast resources of the few be reallocated in order to provide those most basic necessities.   Because we pass moral judgement on the poor.  We secretly still believe they deserve it.  They are morally less entitled.  

There's no distributive reason why everyone shouldn't be given a key to an apartment and a small but adequate allowance at 18, with an option to trade up on evidence of talent and effort. (However those are measured.)

I agree.  Few people even in America will argue against public education.  The whole idea behind public education was that it would give all Americans an equal start regardless of their background.  Now we live in an age where a HS diploma is necessary but having nothing more is like the equivalent of grandma only having an 8th grade education.   It's simply not enough.  I suspect people without any college or vocational education are more likely to be the same people who will need the social safety nets we resent people for needing.  So if we really think all people deserve an equal start regardless of their background, and if we hate having to come to the rescue of the destitute, why not collectively invest the money up front so that much fewer people find themselves reliant on public resources later on?   Because poor people are ungrateful freeloaders.  Dontcha know?  They are just going to live off us like vampires and contribute nothing to society.  This is the moral judgement we pass.  Forget that the security of a garanteed -however small- income and a roof over one's head probably goes a long way toward preventing people from turning to crime and substance abuse in order to survive.  

Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.

by poemless on Wed Mar 26th, 2008 at 12:13:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
They are just going to live off us like vampires and contribute nothing to society.  This is the moral judgement we pass.

I grew up in culture that exemplified that moral judgement, and believed it myself for half my life.  And yet, I've come to wonder:  what does Paris Hilton contribute to society, other than a few punch lines for the evening talk shows?  What has Richard Melon Scaife contributed, other than catapulting the self-fulfilling propaganda that justifies his wealth and privilege?  Who are the vampires, and who are the victims?

Somewhere in cyberspace, the ghost of de Chardin is smiling.

by budr on Wed Apr 2nd, 2008 at 08:45:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You could argue that Paris Hilton is not a drain on society. People actually pay her to be a public bubble-head; she's an idiot so's you don't have to be.

In today's celebrity obsessed culture people think she is interesting and her behaviour is newws. It keeps people in jobs in magazines and on telly cos other less-famous airheads want to read about such people.

It just shows that it's easy to get rich if you're already rich.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Apr 2nd, 2008 at 11:21:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
She certainly gives the chattering class something inconsequential to talk about, and no doubt keeps some of them employed, but I doubt that she is actually living off the proceeds of her airheadedness.  I think it more likely she lives off inherited wealth as unearned as the media attention she gets, and donates the gossip fodder for free.  I suppose that's a public service of sorts.

Somewhere in cyberspace, the ghost of de Chardin is smiling.
by budr on Wed Apr 2nd, 2008 at 11:51:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I read somewhere that she earnt a personal fortune of $70 million on the back of being a celebrity. Makes Jade Goody's £8 million seem platry, but JG probably has worse financial advice.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Apr 2nd, 2008 at 12:07:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Sigh.  It just shows that it's easy to get rich if you're already rich.

Somewhere in cyberspace, the ghost of de Chardin is smiling.
by budr on Wed Apr 2nd, 2008 at 12:24:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series