European Tribune

Display:
Corn on corn is not sustainable even in the short run.  Pest (nematodes, corn borer, Cargill, ADM, & so on :-) populations explode and the land becomes too sick to support a viable crop.  Even the old corn-beans duo-crop rotation required massive and expensive pesticide, herbicide, and fungicide applications.  And the "expensive" didn't include the external cost of turning the Iowa, Des Moines, & etc rivers into toxic chemical soups or the rise in cancers among farmers, naming only two.

A doo run-run-run, a doo run-run
by ATinNM on Sat Mar 8th, 2008 at 01:47:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

  I am surprised to see the monocropping and the farmers are a bit befuddled by it all as well. We always had corn/soy in rotation until just a few years ago and corn/soy/alfalfa(unharvested) would be even better. I suppose we'll have to see some ort of systemic failure before it changes - crop failure due to things you describe, or ethanol plant failure due to policy changes related to global food security, etc.

  Interesting times in which we live ...

by SacredCowTipper (sct@strandedwind.org) on Sat Mar 8th, 2008 at 04:22:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series