Display:
I believe that you are forgetting the fact that the Danish government had a deliberate policy of supporting research and development of wind technology. No small part of the Danish wind turbine R&D was done at DTU and Risø - both of which are government institutions.

Without this kind of government-funded research programmes, it is highly unlikely that the Danish wind industry would have ever gotten off the ground. And considering the sway that the drill-and-burn lobby holds over Washington in general and the Repugs in particular, I seriously doubt that such a programme would have survived past the first US Congress committee.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Mar 11th, 2008 at 03:28:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
is that US support mechanisms for wind in the early 80s were not provide good incentives - all the money was upfront, so investors had an all too strong motivation to put up machines that would work initially but did not really care about how they fared in the long run. They were in for a quick buck.

Also, of course, the fact that support has been yanked away, and has generally been inconsistent (sse still today the on/off nature of the PTC mechanism and the yearly uncertainty as to its renewal).

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Mar 11th, 2008 at 04:55:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series