Display:
I don't think that water should be subsidized so that farmers can grow water intensive crops in the desert, however,not subsidizing water is not the same thing as auctioning it off.  Water is a basic human right and those cannot simply be sold to the highest bidder. There are plenty of countries in the developing world where auctioning water to the highest bidder would mean that it would all go to international corporations while poor people died of thirst.

You can use market mechanisms to allocate water but only if the proper public policies are in place.  Markets are good at setting prices but terrible at determining costs.

Catalonia and the American Southwest have in common that they do not have adequate water resources for the size of their populations.  And as Climaticide continues apace the situation will only worsen.

"My True Religion Is Kindness" -- The Dalai Lama

by JohnnyRook (johnnyrook1@gmail.com) on Wed Apr 2nd, 2008 at 03:20:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I agree that in some places you would be right. However, in the case of both the southwest and here you are wrong - it is precisely because the problem isn't too much population for the water resources available, but rather a system that gives a small group the bulk of the water, that market allocation would mean a drop in the cost of water for your average consumer. But if you prefer to avoid the market that's fine with me, just have the government redistribute the water by fiat as they seem to be proposing.
by MarekNYC on Wed Apr 2nd, 2008 at 11:59:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series