Display:
Whatever works best, subject to the law and civil liberties?  You mentioned command as a problem, not me.  My concern is with accountability/quality/performance in achieving democratically agreed objectives.  Bad governance gives all governance a bad name when there are no tools and procedures for identifying, measuring and correcting it.  My suggestion is that there is a reason why the neo-libs have been so successful in selling their ideology over the past 30 years - despite a very dubious track record in the real world - and a large part of that reason is that they have been able to play on popular resentment of unaccountable bureaucracy and the faux equality of choice of the market place.  

The Government planners otoh have been lousy at marketing their successes and even worse at dealing with their failures.  They have created a new kind of class society where privileged civil servants can lord it over the rest of the populace who don't have the same security of tenure, pensions, unsackability, and unaccountability for their performance.  The democracy of the marketplace is very unequal, but it is better than no democracy at all.

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Sun Apr 13th, 2008 at 05:25:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I agree that the unaccountability of many (not all) governmental bureacracies is a big problem in building a better society.

I would phrase the question like this: How do we build more accountable governmental service systems, so that we as citizens can make sure they work for us and not lord it over us?

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!

by A swedish kind of death on Mon Apr 14th, 2008 at 05:53:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I realise that you're playing devil's advocate here, but I cannot help but point out that you are the one writing the bigger blank cheque vis-a-vis transparency. Corporate structures have near-zero transparency and bad capitalists usually do not fail.

To take a simple example, in most parts of Denmark it is literally impossible to buy food without financially supporting the wars in Vietraq and Afghanistan. I can vote against those wars in the ballot box. I cannot vote against them with my euros. Much the same can be said for textiles produced in SE Asian sweatshops. And cell phones containing copper from cyanide heap-leech mining.

Alright, you might argue that I can manage without a phone if heap-leech mining bothers me so much. But you'd be hard pressed to argue that I can do without clothes and food.

So the reality is that lamenting the lack of transparency in government bureaucracies (and thus tacitly implying that there is transparency in the "free market") is simply not an apples-to-apples comparison. And that is the first point we'll want to make, I think.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Apr 14th, 2008 at 02:08:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series