Neo - liberalism appeals to the values of the small entrepreneur - who is often subject to fierce market disciplines and bitterly resents regulatory costs and perceived unfairness and inefficiencies.  Large global corporations give lip services to competition, but in reality are dedicated to destroying it, by fair means or foul.  They need some regulation to be able to operate and often have the power to ensure it reinforces their position and makes life difficult for new entrants or weaker rivals.  

However they have also been much more effective at playing of nation states against each other and maximising their advantage.  International regulation is a bit like  trade unionism, which offsets the weakness of an individual vis a vis a large business through collective bargaining.  It is only through a large number of states controlling access to key markets acting collectively that they have any chance of regulating global firms effectively.

There is absolutely no reason why the transformation of organisational systems should be exclusive to the private sector, and every reason why it shouldn't be.  But vested interests aren't the exclusive preserve of the private sector, and we lack an informed political culture capable of ensuring the necessary, and in this case real, reforms take place so that public sector organisations can rival the private in inefficiency and effectiveness, but with respect to a much more socially and environmentally responsible set of goals.

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."