European Tribune

Display:
The original issue was whether the Western European countries would face any downside from forcing the dissolution of NATO. My argument is that they would be virtually certain to face greater difficulty in pursuing EU integration and that there is a small but real chance of causing the political destabilization of some EU members. You seem to be saying that the fears that would lead to those negative consequences are irrational and should therefore be ignored. I agree they're irrational, but so what? It won't make them go away. And therefore it is only sensible to take them into account.  

PS, you seem to be focussed on this war thing, but that's not what I was talking about.

by MarekNYC on Fri Apr 4th, 2008 at 03:08:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Nato is a military alliance.  It is a "war thing."

Come, my friends, 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
by poemless on Fri Apr 4th, 2008 at 03:24:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
24 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
84 comments

The Purpose of Education
by rdf - Nov 20
1 comment

Help oppose Sarko's three strike nonsense
by nicta - Nov 20
6 comments

LQD: The real orgasmic Puritans
by Ted Welch - Nov 20
6 comments

So I met Bill McKibben
by SacredCowTipper - Nov 20
3 comments

LQD: Geoengineering Ranked
by nanne - Nov 21
30 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
8 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series