Display:
I'm glad to see this in the NYT -- which, in the build-up and start to the Iraq War, shared in the "he said, she said" presentation style, and also in the "in bed with" journalism ethos. This is more like it:

Behind Analysts, the Pentagon's Hidden Hand - New York Times

But The Times successfully sued the Defense Department to gain access to 8,000 pages of e-mail messages, transcripts and records describing years of private briefings, trips to Iraq and Guantánamo and an extensive Pentagon talking points operation.

Worth noting too (given ET's emphasis on media manipulation through pundits fed talking-point boilerplate):

Internal Pentagon documents repeatedly refer to the military analysts as "message force multipliers" or "surrogates" who could be counted on to deliver administration "themes and messages" to millions of Americans "in the form of their own opinions."
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Apr 21st, 2008 at 04:54:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yep. Now all we need is the same kind of effort for 'economic policy' and especially 'reform.'

Let's not pretend it doesn't exist and the noise isn't as carefully orchestrated.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Mon Apr 21st, 2008 at 06:21:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series