European Tribune

Display:
Two things, one of which I only learnt recently:

  1. The unions had previously kept to the 5% pay rise cap, introduced in order to bring down inflation. Their break with it was part of the deal, and nothing to do with union excesses, despite what revisionists later made it out to be.

  2. You didn't mention Clause IV, which I always thought was of incredible importance. I remember it was always mentioned on the radio, for months and months on end, though I had no idea what it meant. I now know what it was, but a full explanation of how it fits at the end of the story would be nice.

(I actually remember John Smith dying, but mainly because I have an uncle of the same name. How things would be different now, had he lived.)

Member of the Anti-Fabulousness League since 1987.
by Ephemera on Sun Apr 27th, 2008 at 04:17:14 PM EST
I didn't mention it because it was more an excuse for the right-wing to hammer labour than any big deal in terms of policy formulation.

It was kept for totemic value, but getting rid of it was emblemetic of shedding the militant past which ws far more important. As a formulation of words it was not only meaningless in the 90s, it was meaningless when it had been incorporated. It was only done to throw a thank-you bone for the Webbs who were saddo Marxists but who had been instrumental in getting the party started.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Apr 27th, 2008 at 04:29:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Didn't the Fabian tendency and those who left to form the Social Democrats following the "Gang of four" also want to get rid of Clause IV?

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Apr 27th, 2008 at 04:55:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The Fabians weren't a tendency afaik, but they were fairly moderate.

By the time Clause 4 was eliminated, most members of the party knew it was meaningless except for people who actually thought Britain still had a Marxist future. It was like throwing away a piece of clothing we never wore and didn't need.

Disclaimer : I was a member of the party during the 80s and had my share of shouting matches and genuine physical intimidation from Militant. They were scum who deserved to be removed. I left the party because I realised Blairism was coming and didn't like it. And a few other more personal reasons.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Apr 27th, 2008 at 05:01:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
24 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
84 comments

The Purpose of Education
by rdf - Nov 20
1 comment

Help oppose Sarko's three strike nonsense
by nicta - Nov 20
6 comments

LQD: The real orgasmic Puritans
by Ted Welch - Nov 20
8 comments

So I met Bill McKibben
by SacredCowTipper - Nov 20
3 comments

LQD: Geoengineering Ranked
by nanne - Nov 21
32 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
8 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series