European Tribune

Display:
Didn't the Fabian tendency and those who left to form the Social Democrats following the "Gang of four" also want to get rid of Clause IV?

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Apr 27th, 2008 at 04:55:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The Fabians weren't a tendency afaik, but they were fairly moderate.

By the time Clause 4 was eliminated, most members of the party knew it was meaningless except for people who actually thought Britain still had a Marxist future. It was like throwing away a piece of clothing we never wore and didn't need.

Disclaimer : I was a member of the party during the 80s and had my share of shouting matches and genuine physical intimidation from Militant. They were scum who deserved to be removed. I left the party because I realised Blairism was coming and didn't like it. And a few other more personal reasons.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Apr 27th, 2008 at 05:01:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
The Purpose of Education
by rdf - Nov 20
27 comments

In Defense of the Electoral College
by danps - Nov 22
10 comments

LQD: NATO as 'convenient threat' for Russia
by marco - Nov 21
30 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
20 comments

jitter noise rumble
by emilmoller - Nov 19
18 comments

LQD: The real orgasmic Puritans
by Ted Welch - Nov 20
36 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
122 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
58 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series