Display:
Wikipedia is getting quite a reputation as a reasonably reliable, very comprehensive, and yet accessible knowledge base which allows people to get a handle on a topic very quickly.  How do you want to position ETpedia relative to that space?
I'm not sure I understand the question. MediaWiki is used by a whole lot of communities to maintain their knowledge base and that's what we'd do. We're not trying to position ourselves in the online encyclopedia space.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu May 1st, 2008 at 03:24:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In the media world, no one cares how the content is organised as long as it's accessible and actively promoted.

We can certainly have an internal Wiki, but realistically Wikis aren't considered 'serious' by the MSM. That could well be their loss, but the MSM are still the main medium for getting points into the mainstream, and we need to follow their format if we want to - actually get points into the mainstream.

We need a press presence. We need a point of contact for press people, and we need to send out regular press releases. We may also need a serious website. I don't think a Wiki will do the job, because it's not the right tool for the job at hand - which is media impact, not information aggregation. Something like Comment is Free with an ET twist might.

All of this may be window dressing and fluff as far as the content goes. But in terms of prescience and analysis we have some of the best content in the blogosphere, and a lot of it is being wasted because more people aren't seeing it.

On average we seem to be running about two to five years ahead of Conventional Wisdom. If we want to start changing all of Teh Stupid that makes up conventional wisdom we need to be much more active about crafting a solid media presence and making sure that talking points are pushed regularly znd reliably into national and international debate.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu May 1st, 2008 at 10:23:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Everyone probably knows this, but on news.google.com, you can limit searches to news sites by adding site:[NEWS SITE DOMAIN NAME].COM.

For example, searching on

olympic torch relay site:cnn.com

will only pull up articles from CNN's website on that topic.

It turns out that not just new publications and organizations come up in Google news, but "think tanks" like The New America Foundation and the The Century Foundation also come up on Google News searches, while others like The Economic Policy Institute and The Progressive Policy Institute do not come up at all.

It would be interesting to learn what differentiates these, and to see if we can get EuroTrib.com to come up on Google News searches as well.

A language is a dialect with an army and navy.

by marco (cowannar at gmail punkt com) on Thu May 1st, 2008 at 01:38:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series