European Tribune

Display:
Nitpicking: as I understand it from the reports so far, what Del Ponte brought us is the story of the yellow house, the claim that organ harvesting took place there was rumours (possibly from Serbs) that first led her there. (This is why I am curious about the details of what Del Ponte writes.)

I note Doug M's main argument against Del Ponte herself seems to be a well emphasized low opinion of her...

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Tue Apr 8th, 2008 at 05:54:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
OK, let's see what she writes. However CDP must have been the recipient of hundreds of claims of crimes. Why would she include this particular story if she wasn't at least suspicious of the circumstances? Again, this might or might not be true, and everyone is presumed innocent until found guilty. Doug's reasons for it not to be true however are weak. And don't get me started on the very simple picture he's painting about the relationship between the KLA and Berisha on the one hand, and the de facto relation that the Socialists, barely controlling the country in 1999, much less the North of the country, had with the KLA.

IIRC Doug has had historically a low opinion of Del Ponte, regarding her total lack of an understanding of what her actions entailed politically. Not as far as I can remember regarding her competence as a public prosecutor. Anyway it would be a far stretch indeed, I repeat, to portray Del Ponte as pro-Serb.

The two points I wanted to make, did not have mainly to do with whether this is a true story (we have no way to find out anymore) but rather with the potentially very contagious nature of the whole concept and the near certainty that were this an accusation of organ snatching against the Serbs, it would be treated with much less scepticism, to say the least.

The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom - William Blake

by talos (mihalis at gmail dot com) on Tue Apr 8th, 2008 at 12:41:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Del Ponte's sources on this story are Western journalists who heard of the story, and were told of the yellow house, by people who new of it firsthand. Del Ponte's people actually informed the Serbs about this, not the other way around.

For some odd reason, the men who maraud, rape and slice and dice, are often proud of their dirty work, to the point of compulsively wanting to show their deeds to journalists and witnesses. This has been the case through the 20th century. I can cite numerous examples, including the well known one in the Balkans in which the Italian ambassador, Kurt Erich Suckert, was passed a bowl full of eyeballs. Naser Oric showed his handiwork to a Canadian journalist. Hitler made films of the Valkyrie executions. Etc. It's no small wonder that journalists would be far more apt to hear of such acts than investigators.

by Upstate NY on Wed Apr 9th, 2008 at 03:01:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Del Ponte's sources on this story are Western journalists who heard of the story, and were told of the yellow house, by people who new of it firsthand.

Could you quote the source for us?

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 03:29:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Unfortunately I can't. I'm getting this from snippets of Del Ponte's book which have been released. That's where the sources of the information are quoted, and then she describes the subsequent investigative follow-up.

One thing to note: I read these quotes in English, and Del Ponte's book is not written in English, and the quotes I read were not attributed to any particular translator. I actually don't know where they came from.

by Upstate NY on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 08:10:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Just for the sake of precision, the book was written in English- actually American- and translated into Italian. Feltrinelli is pulling off another literary scoop as it did with Dr. Zhivago. It is coming out in anteprima worldwide in the translated version. It's been in the bookstores for the past week in Italian but will come out in "American" once enough hype has been generated. It is a very lengthy book that touches Carla Del Ponte's entire career.
by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 09:07:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Really? Wow. Then the articles I was reading were completely half-cocked because they claimed the English translation is not due for awhile. Hard to believe anything these days.
by Upstate NY on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 09:54:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Telegraph versions are translations from Italian according to the site.

The book, which I have, has written "translated from American." I presume it must be based on tapes and put together in English by the two authors. Del Ponte does speak several languages.

by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 01:35:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I found in today's Torygraph:

Serb prisoners 'were stripped of their organs in Kosovo war' - Telegraph

Miss Del Ponte reports that the allegations were made by several sources, one of whom "personally made an organ delivery" to an Albanian airport for transport abroad, and "confirmed information directly gathered by the tribunal".

According to the sources, senior figures in the Kosovo Liberation Army were aware of the scheme, in which hundreds of young Serbs were allegedly taken by truck from Kosovo to northern Albania where their organs were removed. Miss Del Ponte provides grim details of the alleged organ harvesting, and of how some prisoners were sewn up after having kidneys removed.

"The victims, deprived of a kidney, were then locked up again, inside the barracks, until the moment they were killed for other vital organs. In this way, the other prisoners were aware of the fate that awaited them, and according to the source, pleaded, terrified, to be killed immediately," Miss Del Ponte writes.

That's a more complex picture (with not all alleged organ-harvesting equal to killing; throwing up the question whether there could have been survivors), and indeed Del Ponte reports sources making quite specific claims, it's not mere rumours.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 04:08:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Torygraph includes excerpts from the book, which if anything make the case even more suspicious - and are in fact quite shocking. I note that the book explicitly states that: "According to the journalists' sources, who were only identified as Kosovo Albanians, some of the younger and fitter prisoners were visited by doctors and were never hit"... and it is that small subset of the 300 captured Serbs that were killed for their organs - apparently from the rest of the story that includes 1 kidney and 1 other organ.

The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom - William Blake
by talos (mihalis at gmail dot com) on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 07:48:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks for that link, that gives all the answers!

In the first excerpt (on what preceded the yellow house visit), I think I can read out something between the lines:

'The material within [from the office of the court] does not contain specific material from Albania; but a low number of witness statements and other material we have confirms and to a certain extent amplifies the stated information,' I noted in a memo on this activity.

...The victims of these cases were probably seized after the end of the NATO air campaign... It was not clear whether crimes committed in this arc of time fell under the mandate of the tribunal.

The prosecutors office should have asked for the names of the sources from the journalists and UNMIK as well as any other information they had on this case.

E.g., this case didn't solidify further not because of simply weak evidence but because it wasn't properly investigated; Del Ponte suggests her hands were bound, with the territorial and temporal limits to her Tribunal. The last sentence is mysterious, her being the Chief Prosecutor; does she suggest some outside (or lower-ranked inside) powers prevented the prosecutors' office from taking action?

From the second excerpt:

The house was now white. The owner denied it had ever been repainted even though investigators found traces of yellow along the base of its walls.

...The syringes, the iv solution bags, the gauze are clearly material which confirms the tales, but as proof they are unfortunately insufficient. The investigators were not able to determine whether the traces they found were of human blood. The sources did not indicated the position of the grave of the presumed victims and so we did not find the bodies.



*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 11:17:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Off topic, but is it typical in Europe to refer to an unmarried woman as Miss?
by Upstate NY on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 08:13:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Torygraph is not in Europe. It's in Great Britain. They could sue you for that comment you know.

The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom - William Blake
by talos (mihalis at gmail dot com) on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 08:16:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Is that what the Torygraph does?

FWIW, a long time ago when I was learning English I was told Ms is neutral with respect to marital status, and I tend to use that almost exclusively. But that's just me.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 08:17:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That is common practice in the United States as well. Miss is used for a very young woman, and NEVER for a professional woman.
by Upstate NY on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 09:55:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Guardian's now reporting it, too.

"You can't be a successful crook with a dishonest face, now, can you?" -The Fourth Doctor
by lychee (lychee9393 A yahoo D com) on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 07:42:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Del Ponte's own judgement on the yellow house, from the Torygraph article:

The book reports a visit by Hague tribunal investigators to a house south of the Albanian town of Burrel where they found traces of blood across a wide area, as well as medical equipment.

"The investigators found pieces of gauze, a used syringe and two plastic IV bags encrusted with mud and empty bottles of medicine, some of which was of a muscle relaxant often used in surgical operations," she writes. However, she concludes that the finds do not amount to sufficient proof for a war crimes tribunal.

They also quote this negative view on the claims from someone in Serbia:

In Belgrade, Natasha Kandic, the highly respected head of the investigative Humanitarian Law Centre, said ordinary Serbs "welcome the publication of this book" but said allegations of organ-smuggling were "rumours". "I talked to her many times, she never told me about this," said Miss Kandic.


*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 04:12:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
??? Kandic's quote gives off the scent of someone certain of their self-importance. What is she actually saying? That Del Ponte never informed her therefore Del Ponte is making it up? Wow.

The Serb War Crimes people are on record as saying that Del Ponte informed them of the investigation.

by Upstate NY on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 08:15:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Before judging Kandic, note that this is the Torygraph.

This paragraph on Kandic is a mix of a few short disparate paraphrases and direct quotes, who knows how much mis-representation was in abridging a fuller interview, and who knows on  how much information (presumably told by the interviewer) she could base her judgement.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Fri Apr 11th, 2008 at 11:01:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
The Purpose of Education
by rdf - Nov 20
17 comments

LQD: The real orgasmic Puritans
by Ted Welch - Nov 20
32 comments

LQD: NATO as 'convenient threat' for Russia
by marco - Nov 21
10 comments

jitter noise rumble
by emilmoller - Nov 19
18 comments

Computational simulations in science
by tiagoantao - Nov 20
20 comments

The Puritan Edge
by rg - Nov 20
122 comments

Early Friday Photography Blog No. 62
by LEP - Nov 20
58 comments

Help oppose Sarko's three strike nonsense
by nicta - Nov 20
8 comments

Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series