Display:
Well, true.

But for whatever reason, the records we have of populist preachers stirring up the masses largely seem to include genuine quotes from the Bible.

Your 14th C parish priest could actually make up anything most of the time, because the unwashed weren't allowed near the "source material."

But, in the end, if we're talking about a movement as widespread as Frank is suggesting, then it had to draw legitimacy from somewhere, and people's mindspace was "The Bible" to a large extent, as far as we know about those times.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Tue Apr 8th, 2008 at 10:41:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Metatone:
Your 14th C parish priest could actually make up anything most of the time, because the unwashed weren't allowed near the "source material."
Why do you think the Second Vatican Council was so revolutionary? For the first time in centuries the masses, unwashed or otherwise, could actually understand what the priest was saying.

Also, for a long time even a lot of clergymen were illiterate in latin and the introduction of the missal made it unnecessary even for priests to read the bible.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Apr 21st, 2008 at 05:22:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series