Display:
Any evidence that gays constituted "rivals to its monopoly over faith"?  I suspect it was more a case of scapegoating/deflecting tensions against a vulnerable minority.  While there may have been individual cases of homosexuality being used as a stick to beat a rival for power, my understanding is that gays did not become an identifiable sub group/sub culture until much later, and never constituted a threat to the Church's hold on the faithful (until now!).

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Wed Apr 9th, 2008 at 08:20:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Any evidence that gays constituted "rivals to its monopoly over faith"?

You misunderstand. Cathars, Bogumils and so were the rivals I meant, and calling them gays was a way to exploit popular homophobia to split these popular non-Church-controlled religious movements from the people, and later to more easily demonise executed 'heretics' before the populace.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Wed Apr 9th, 2008 at 08:49:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series