Display:
I've been looking at some French mediaevalists on this, in particular Georges Duby and Jacques Le Goff. Since this stuff is not online, I'd have to type it all out and translate, so I'll try to summarize instead.

The first point is that the toughening in attitudes to homosexuality is part of a general revision of Church doctrine on sexuality. The second is that these changes concern Western Christendom, ie the Roman Church. The third, that they are contemporaneous with the rise of the Middle Ages.

Roughly sketched, the fall of the Roman Empire opened a period of barbarian invasions often called the Dark Ages, that came to an end in the C10. At that point the barbarian kingdoms are Christianised, but Rome's hierarchical hold over local Churches is tenuous. From the C10, there is the beginning of economic change (rise of towns and trade) which is concomitant with the rise of the monasteries. New monastery-building goes hand in hand with a spirit of reformation, the most important aspect of which is the Benedictine reform set off especially from Cluny (founded 910) in Burgundy. Monastic life becomes stricter and its spiritual aspirations higher. This "puritanical" movement sees, not just the monasteries but also the bishops and secular clergy, as corrupt and in need of profound change. It seeks independence from royal, feudal or episcopal control by calling for patronage on the bishop of Rome - in other words, the traditional head of Western Christendom, who finds in return a new means of asserting power over the crumbled remains of the empire.

So the monastic reformation leads, during the C11 and into the C12, to a Rome-led general reformation of the Church (celebrated from the C12 in Gothic architecture).

Georges Duby, Le Moyen âgeDuby, The Middle Ages
Il était urgent d'épurer le clergé, disaient les rigoristes: deux souillures, le sexe et l'argent, l'infectaient. Au XIe siècle, tous les prêtres ou presque étaient mariés. Les chanoines aussi. Non point les évêques, certes, mais on pouvait douter qu'ils fussent chastes.There was an urgent need to purify the clergy, said the rigorists: two impurities, sex and money, infected it. In the eleventh century, all or nearly all priests were married. The canons too. Not the bishops, but it was doubtful they were chaste.

Jacques Le Goff, Corps et idéologie dans l'Occident médiéval
Ce qu'on appelle la réforme grégorienne a été un grand aggiornamento de la société médiévale, conduite par l'Eglise et commençant par elle, des alentours de 1050 à 1215 (IVe concile de Latran). Elle institue d'abord l'indépendance de l'Eglise par rapport aux laïcs. Quelle meilleure barrière instituer entre clercs et laïcs que celle de la sexualité? A ceux-ci le mariage, aux premiers la virginité, le célibat et la continence. Un mur sépare la pureté de l'impureté. Les liquides impurs sont bannis d'un côté (les clercs ne doivent répandre ni sperme ni sang, et ne pas transmettre le péché originel en procréant), simplement canalisés de l'autre. L'Eglise devient une société de célibataires. En revanche, elle enferme la société laïque dans le mariage. What is known as the Gregorian Reform was a great aggiornamento of medieval society, led by and starting with the Church, from around 1050 to around 1215 (Fourth Lateran). It first established the independence of the Church in relation to the laity. What better barrier to set up between clergy and lay people than sexuality? For the latter, marriage, the former, virginity, chastity and continence. A wall separates purity from impurity. The impure liquids are banned on one side (clerics should not shed semen or blood, and not transmit original sin by procreating), simply canalized on the other. The Church becomes a society of celibates. On the other hand, it imprisons secular society in marriage.

And so the Roman Church, from the C11 to C13, creates the new concept of Christian marriage, outside of which sex has no place, and within which sex is strictly regulated (no sex during the woman's "impurity", on Sundays, in other than the missionary position, etc). Le Goff continues:

Jacques Le Goff, Corps et idéologie dans l'Occident médiéval
Mais la répression sexuelle ne touche pas que le mariage. J. Boswell a montré que l'Eglise, jusqu'au XIIe siècle, avait manifesté, dans la pratique au moins, une assez grande indulgence à l'égard de l'homosexualité. Une gay culture avait même pu s'épanouir à l'ombre de l'Eglise et souvent en son sein. Désormais l'indulgence est en règle générale finie. On lutte contre la sodomie, rapprochée de l'hérésie dans un amalgame redoutable. Ainsi le pécheurs sexuels font partie du monde des réprouvés, dans cette grande opération d'exclusion du XIIIe siècle.Les réprouvés sexuels bénéficient même difficilement et rarement du nouvel au-delà qui crée un espace et un temps supplémentaires de purification dans l'Autre Monde: le Purgatoire. Le sexe reste gibier d'Enfer.But sexual repression does not affect marriage alone. J. Boswell has demonstrated that the Church, until the twelfth century, showed, in practice at least, fairly broad indulgence towards homosexuality. A gay culture had even been able to flourish in the shadow of the Church and often within it. From this time on, indulgence is, as a general rule, over and done with. Sodomy is fought against, brought alongside heresy in a fearsome combination. Thus sexual sinners are part of the world of reprobates, in this great thirteenth-century operation of exclusion. Sexual reprobates scarcely and rarely benefit from the new Beyond that creates additional space and time for purification in the Other World : Purgatory. Sex remains hellfire-bound.

There are fairly obvious subjacent questions here, to do with popular belief, with purity/impurity, with rising hysteria regarding the body and its functions, on which the Church built what is still recognisably its doctrine with regard to sex. They'll be for another time...

When locusts move on, they leave nothing behind

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Apr 10th, 2008 at 06:37:29 AM EST
Thanks for these substantial quotes.  I get the impression that the repression of gays was almost collateral to the suppression of sexual activity amongst the clergy in general and part of a much larger attempt to reform (and re-exert control over) a lot of almost autonomous local churches, monasteries and religious orders which were perceived to have become corrupted by wealth and licentiousness.

When looking backwards from today it is easy to make the mistake of seeing the church through the eyes of a centralised, homogeneous, monolithic and all powerful institution when the reality was very different - a lot of power struggles within and without the church around money, land, inheritance, and political power.

The insistence on celibacy was as much about ensuring that all property accrued to the Church rather than to the children and heirs of priests and Bishops - than it was about sexuality per se.  I suspect homosexulaity may have been practiced very widely to get around rules re. mixing with the opposite sex and so too had to be condemned.  This was a time of very great turmoil in society and anyone acting outside perceived norms would have been in great danger.  It doesn't quite explain why same sex marriages were discontinued, but certainly a great wave of puritanism seems to have engulfed the Church, if not society as a whole.

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Thu Apr 10th, 2008 at 07:31:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Debates
Campaigns
Occasional Series